These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28803961)
1. The 99th percentile and imprecision of point-of-care cardiac troponin I in comparison to central laboratory tests in a large reference population. Greiser A; Winter T; Mahfoud H; Kallner A; Ittermann T; Masuch A; Lubenow N; Kohlmann T; Greinacher A; Nauck M; Petersmann A Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28803961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Point-of-care troponin T is inferior to high-sensitivity troponin T for ruling out acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Ter Avest E; Visser A; Reitsma B; Breedveld R; Wolthuis A Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 25536392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of cardiac Troponin I: A comparison between the POCT AQT90 FLEX and the Dimension Vista analyzer in an emergency setting. Mion MM; Bragato G; Casarotti A; Cosma C; Vigolo S; Vettore G; Tosato F; Zaninotto M; Plebani M Clin Biochem; 2017 Sep; 50(13-14):763-767. PubMed ID: 28377153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing analytical outliers and the percent of emergency department patients with results above the 99th percentile upper reference limit for 2 conventional and one high sensitivity troponin assay. Karon BS; Wockenfus AM; Hartung KJ; Scott RJ; Carter SD; Jaffe AS Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():104-109. PubMed ID: 29305092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to choose a point-of-care testing for troponin. Lin YH; Zhang Y; Liu YT; Cui K; Kang JS; Zhou Z J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Jul; 34(7):e23263. PubMed ID: 32222055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct comparison of clinical decision limits for cardiac troponin T and I. Kimenai DM; Henry RM; van der Kallen CJ; Dagnelie PC; Schram MT; Stehouwer CD; van Suijlen JD; Niens M; Bekers O; Sep SJ; Schaper NC; van Dieijen-Visser MP; Meex SJ Heart; 2016 Apr; 102(8):610-6. PubMed ID: 26794233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of 19 cardiac troponin I and T assay 99th percentile values from a common presumably healthy population. Apple FS; Ler R; Murakami MM Clin Chem; 2012 Nov; 58(11):1574-81. PubMed ID: 22983113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of 0/1 h cardiac troponin algorithm for diagnosing non-STEMI in an emergency setting. Gou Q; Liang L; Liu D; Jia J; Dong M; Chen H; Shou X Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Sep; 71():139-143. PubMed ID: 37392513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the AQT90 FLEX cTnI point-of-care assay for the rapid diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency room. Ivandic BT; Spanuth E; Giannitsis E Clin Lab; 2014; 60(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 25016693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the Advia Centaur second-generation troponin assay TnI-Ultra compared with the first-generation cTnI assay. van de Kerkhof D; Peters B; Scharnhorst V Ann Clin Biochem; 2008 May; 45(Pt 3):316-7. PubMed ID: 18482922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discordance with 3 Cardiac Troponin I and T Assays: Implications for the 99th Percentile Cutoff. Ungerer JP; Tate JR; Pretorius CJ Clin Chem; 2016 Aug; 62(8):1106-14. PubMed ID: 27335076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 5th generation cardiac troponin I and T assays in clinical routine - A head-to-head comparison with data from the Linz troponin (LITROP) study. Mueller T; Egger M; Peer E; Dieplinger B Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Oct; 485():195-204. PubMed ID: 29958891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical evaluation of a new point of care system for measuring cardiac Troponin I. Kemper DW; Semjonow V; de Theije F; Keizer D; van Lippen L; Mair J; Wille B; Christ M; Geier F; Hausfater P; Pariente D; Scharnhorst V; Curvers J; Nieuwenhuis J Clin Biochem; 2017 Mar; 50(4-5):174-180. PubMed ID: 27847339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No increase in the incidence of cardiac troponin I concentration above the 99th percentile by Siemens Centaur high-sensitivity compared to the contemporary assay. Yang HS; Shemesh A; Li J; Xie T; Apple FS; Williams J; Zhao Z; Steel PAD Clin Biochem; 2021 Mar; 89():77-80. PubMed ID: 33296707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of physical activity of individuals and creatine kinase on 99th percentiles of troponin I assays. Petersmann A; Ittermann T; Frieß C; Lubenow N; Kohlmann T; Greinacher A; Masuch A; Nauck M Clin Chim Acta; 2016 Nov; 462():187-192. PubMed ID: 27712987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance, variance, and outliers in 4 contemporary cardiac troponin assays: implications for harmonization. Ungerer JP; Marquart L; O'Rourke PK; Wilgen U; Pretorius CJ Clin Chem; 2012 Jan; 58(1):274-83. PubMed ID: 22125306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytical characterization and clinical performance evaluation of a new point-of-care testing system for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay. Zhang R; Hong Y; Shi J; Zhao R; Song Y; Li Z; Wang Q Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 Nov; 58(6):579-585. PubMed ID: 34120481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I 99th percentile upper reference limits in a healthy Korean population. Ji M; Moon HW; Hur M; Yun YM Clin Biochem; 2016 Jul; 49(10-11):756-61. PubMed ID: 27067595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of Undetectable, Measurable, and Increased Cardiac Troponin I Concentrations Above the 99th Percentile Using a High-Sensitivity vs a Contemporary Assay in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department. Love SA; Sandoval Y; Smith SW; Nicholson J; Cao J; Ler R; Schulz K; Apple FS Clin Chem; 2016 Aug; 62(8):1115-9. PubMed ID: 27324737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiovascular risk stratification in hemodialysis patients in the era of highly sensitive troponins: should we choose between hs-troponin I and hs-troponin T? Bargnoux AS; Kuster N; Patrier L; Dupuy AM; Tachon G; Maurice F; Badaoui B; Chalabi L; Badiou S; Deleuze S; Leray-Moragues H; Morena M; Canaud B; Cristol JP Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Apr; 54(4):673-82. PubMed ID: 26457775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]