BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28804930)

  • 1. Gaussian covariance graph models accounting for correlated marker effects in genome-wide prediction.
    Martínez CA; Khare K; Rahman S; Elzo MA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Oct; 134(5):412-421. PubMed ID: 28804930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling correlated marker effects in genome-wide prediction via Gaussian concentration graph models.
    Martínez CA; Khare K; Rahman S; Elzo MA
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jan; 437():67-78. PubMed ID: 29055677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Joint genome-wide prediction in several populations accounting for randomness of genotypes: A hierarchical Bayes approach. II: Multivariate spike and slab priors for marker effects and derivation of approximate Bayes and fractional Bayes factors for the complete family of models.
    Martínez CA; Khare K; Banerjee A; Elzo MA
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Mar; 417():131-141. PubMed ID: 28088357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint genome-wide prediction in several populations accounting for randomness of genotypes: A hierarchical Bayes approach. I: Multivariate Gaussian priors for marker effects and derivation of the joint probability mass function of genotypes.
    Martínez CA; Khare K; Banerjee A; Elzo MA
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Mar; 417():8-19. PubMed ID: 28043819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) for the estimation of genomic breeding values.
    Clark SA; van der Werf J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():321-30. PubMed ID: 23756897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
    Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative covariance estimator to investigate genetic heterogeneity in populations.
    Heslot N; Jannink JL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():93. PubMed ID: 26612537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regularized quantile regression applied to genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits.
    Nascimento M; E Silva FF; de Resende MD; Cruz CD; Nascimento AC; Viana JM; Azevedo CF; Barroso LM
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 Mar; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28340274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of complex human diseases from pathway-focused candidate markers by joint estimation of marker effects: case of chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Bhattacharjee M; Rajeevan MS; Sillanpää MJ
    Hum Genomics; 2015 Jun; 9(1):8. PubMed ID: 26063326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic Prediction Accounting for Residual Heteroskedasticity.
    Ou Z; Tempelman RJ; Steibel JP; Ernst CW; Bates RO; Bello NM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Nov; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26564950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.
    De los Campos G; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Crossa J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Aug; 92(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 20943010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A certain invariance property of BLUE in a whole-genome regression context.
    Gianola D; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 30614572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.