These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28805295)

  • 21. Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.
    Choi YH; Yu JW; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
    World J Urol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2129-2135. PubMed ID: 30603783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Johnson DC; Raman SS; Mirak SA; Kwan L; Bajgiran AM; Hsu W; Maehara CK; Ahuja P; Faiena I; Pooli A; Salmasi A; Sisk A; Felker ER; Lu DSK; Reiter RE
    Eur Urol; 2019 May; 75(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 30509763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
    Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
    Costa DN; Lotan Y; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn C; Liu A; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I
    J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 26192254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Apparent diffusion coefficient value is a strong predictor of unsuspected aggressiveness of prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy.
    Renard Penna R; Cancel-Tassin G; Comperat E; Mozer P; Léon P; Varinot J; Roupret M; Bitker MO; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O
    World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1389-95. PubMed ID: 26902878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.
    Mozer P; Rouprêt M; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; de Gorski A; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24552477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
    Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
    Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
    Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
    Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Prostate Biopsy in Stratifying Men for Risk of Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy.
    Raskolnikov D; George AK; Rais-Bahrami S; Turkbey B; Siddiqui MM; Shakir NA; Okoro C; Rothwax JT; Walton-Diaz A; Sankineni S; Su D; Stamatakis L; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
    J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 25623751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
    Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Pathology findings after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in patients eligible for active surveillance: Contribution of multiparametric MRI to treatment decision].
    Martin-Malburet A; Marcq G; Leroy X; Guiffart P; Fantoni JC; Flamand V; Villers A; Puech P; Ouzzane A
    Prog Urol; 2018 Jun; 28(8-9):425-433. PubMed ID: 29789235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Salami SS; Vira MA; Turkbey B; Fakhoury M; Yaskiv O; Villani R; Ben-Levi E; Rastinehad AR
    Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2876-82. PubMed ID: 24917122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
    Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension and Prostatectomy Outcome in Patients with Low-, Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Try to Find a Standard.
    Radtke JP; Hadaschik BA; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Schwab C; Alt C; Roth W; Duensing S; Pahernik SA; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Teber D
    J Endourol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1396-405. PubMed ID: 26154571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
    Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.