These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28805424)

  • 1. The dark side of subjective value in sequential negotiations: The mediating role of pride and anger.
    Becker WJ; Curhan JR
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jan; 103(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 28805424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The polarizing effect of arousal on negotiation.
    Brown AD; Curhan JR
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1928-35. PubMed ID: 23925306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding emotional transitions: the interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations.
    Filipowicz A; Barsade S; Melwani S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):541-56. PubMed ID: 21639649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions.
    Lelieveld GJ; Van Dijk E; Van Beest I; Van Kleef GA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Oct; 105(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 23773043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of intrapersonal anger and its regulation in economic bargaining.
    Fabiansson EC; Denson TF
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51595. PubMed ID: 23300553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all anger is created equal: the impact of the expresser's culture on the social effects of anger in negotiations.
    Adam H; Shirako A
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 23544479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategic consequences of emotional misrepresentation in negotiation: The blowback effect.
    Campagna RL; Mislin AA; Kong DT; Bottom WP
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 May; 101(5):605-24. PubMed ID: 26653531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hot or cold: is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation?
    Sinaceur M; Van Kleef GA; Neale MA; Adam H; Haag C
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):1018-32. PubMed ID: 21688880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger in negotiations.
    Adam H; Shirako A; Maddux WW
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):882-9. PubMed ID: 20483822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of communication experience: definition, measurement, and implications for intercultural negotiations.
    Liu LA; Chua CH; Stahl GK
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):469-87. PubMed ID: 20476827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation.
    Curhan JR; Elfenbein HA; Xu H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 16938032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Be hard on the interests and soft on the values: conflict issue moderates the effects of anger in negotiations.
    Harinck F; Van Kleef GA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Dec; 51(4):741-52. PubMed ID: 22283784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The mind and heart (literally) of the negotiator: personality and contextual determinants of experiential reactions and economic outcomes in negotiation.
    Dimotakis N; Conlon DE; Ilies R
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jan; 97(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 21967294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deception in negotiations: Insights and opportunities.
    Gaspar JP; Methasani R; Schweitzer ME
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Oct; 47():101436. PubMed ID: 36029702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting off on the right foot: subjective value versus economic value in predicting longitudinal job outcomes from job offer negotiations.
    Curhan JR; Elfenbein HA; Kilduff GJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):524-34. PubMed ID: 19271806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asking for less (but receiving more): Women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives.
    Ma A; Ponce de Leon R; Rosette AS
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 Jul; 109(7):1145-1158. PubMed ID: 37824267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a culture-by-context perspective on negotiation: negotiating teams in the United States and Taiwan.
    Gelfand MJ; Brett J; Gunia BC; Imai L; Huang TJ; Hsu BF
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 May; 98(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 23477378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators.
    Mazei J; Hüffmeier J; Freund PA; Stuhlmacher AF; Bilke L; Hertel G
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):85-104. PubMed ID: 25420223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complexity in electronic negotiation support systems.
    Griessmair M; Strunk G; Vetschera R; Koeszegi ST
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2011 Oct; 15(4):477-511. PubMed ID: 21933516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goal orientations in negotiations: the influence of goal orientations on fixed-pie perceptions and bargaining outcomes.
    Katz-Navon TY; Goldschmidt C
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Feb; 44(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 22029443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.