BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806143)

  • 1. Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals.
    Col NF; Solomon AJ; Springmann V; Garbin CP; Ionete C; Pbert L; Alvarez E; Tierman B; Hopson A; Kutz C; Berrios Morales I; Griffin C; Phillips G; Ngo LH
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 28806143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making.
    Col NF; Otero D; Lindman BR; Horne A; Levack MM; Ngo L; Goodloe K; Strong S; Kaplan E; Beaudry M; Coylewright M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0270209. PubMed ID: 35951553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Feasibility and Usability of a Ranking Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Trigger Finger.
    Shapiro LM; Eppler SL; Kamal RN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Jun; 44(6):480-486.e1. PubMed ID: 30797655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-world treatment preferences among health care providers in the United States in selecting disease modifying therapies for patients with multiple sclerosis: a discrete choice experiment.
    Bandari D; Adamson M; Bowman M; Gutierrez A; Athavale A; Oak B; Hadker N; Branco F; Geremakis C; Lewin JB; Shankar SL
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1507-1518. PubMed ID: 37934412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Antiretroviral Treatment Preferences: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Yelverton V; Ostermann J; Hobbie A; Madut D; Thielman N
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2018 Sep; 32(9):340-348. PubMed ID: 30179532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping Perceptions of Lupus Medication Decision-Making Facilitators: The Importance of Patient Context.
    Qu H; Shewchuk RM; Alarcón G; Fraenkel L; Leong A; Dall'Era M; Yazdany J; Singh JA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2016 Dec; 68(12):1787-1794. PubMed ID: 27059939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Exploratory Pilot Study to Describe Shared Decision-Making for PTSD Treatment Planning: The Provider Perspective.
    Etingen B; Hill JN; Miller LJ; Schwartz A; LaVela SL; Jordan N
    Mil Med; 2019 Mar; 184(Suppl 1):467-475. PubMed ID: 30901448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of a patient-specific method for physiotherapy goal setting: a user-centered design.
    Stevens A; Köke A; van der Weijden T; Beurskens A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Aug; 40(17):2048-2055. PubMed ID: 28504014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.
    ; Rieckmann P; Centonze D; Elovaara I; Giovannoni G; Havrdová E; Kesselring J; Kobelt G; Langdon D; Morrow SA; Oreja-Guevara C; Schippling S; Thalheim C; Thompson H; Vermersch P; Aston K; Bauer B; Demory C; Giambastiani MP; Hlavacova J; Nouvet-Gire J; Pepper G; Pontaga M; Rogan E; Rogalski C; van Galen P; Ben-Amor AF
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Jan; 19():153-160. PubMed ID: 29241142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with depression: A randomized controlled trial.
    Perestelo-Perez L; Rivero-Santana A; Sanchez-Afonso JA; Perez-Ramos J; Castellano-Fuentes CL; Sepucha K; Serrano-Aguilar P
    Health Expect; 2017 Oct; 20(5):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 28295915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and Prioritization of Important Attributes of Disease-Modifying Drugs in Decision Making among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Nominal Group Technique and Best-Worst Scaling.
    Kremer IE; Evers SM; Jongen PJ; van der Weijden T; van de Kolk I; Hiligsmann M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164862. PubMed ID: 27812117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients.
    Schulman-Green DJ; Naik AD; Bradley EH; McCorkle R; Bogardus ST
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):145-51. PubMed ID: 16406471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease-modifying drugs: A best-worst scaling.
    Kremer IEH; Evers SMAA; Jongen PJ; Hiligsmann M
    Health Expect; 2018 Feb; 21(1):171-180. PubMed ID: 28734004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Usability and Feasibility of Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients 55 Years and Older.
    Shapiro LM; Eppler SL; Baker LC; Harris AS; Gardner MJ; Kamal RN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 44(10):846-852. PubMed ID: 31495523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment preference and patient centered prostate cancer care: Design and rationale.
    Jayadevappa R; Chhatre S; Gallo JJ; Wittink M; Morales KH; Bruce Malkowicz S; Lee D; Guzzo T; Caruso A; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Sanford Schwartz J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):296-301. PubMed ID: 26435200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual Value Clarification Methods Based on Conjoint Analysis: A Systematic Review of Common Practice in Task Design, Statistical Analysis, and Presentation of Results.
    Weernink MGM; van Til JA; Witteman HO; Fraenkel L; IJzerman MJ
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):746-755. PubMed ID: 29592585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptualizing and prioritizing clinical trial outcomes from the perspectives of people with Parkinson's disease versus health care professionals: a concept mapping study.
    Sjödahl Hammarlund C; Nilsson MH; Idvall M; Rosas SR; Hagell P
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Aug; 23(6):1687-700. PubMed ID: 24390766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nephrologists' Perspectives on Defining and Applying Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis.
    Tong A; Winkelmayer WC; Wheeler DC; van Biesen W; Tugwell P; Manns B; Hemmelgarn B; Harris T; Crowe S; Ju A; O'Lone E; Evangelidis N; Craig JC;
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 12(3):454-466. PubMed ID: 28223290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.