234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806146)
21. Advanced gelatin-based vascularization bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting of vascularized bone equivalents.
Leucht A; Volz AC; Rogal J; Borchers K; Kluger PJ
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5330. PubMed ID: 32210309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Affinity-bound growth factor within sulfated interpenetrating network bioinks for bioprinting cartilaginous tissues.
Wang B; Díaz-Payno PJ; Browe DC; Freeman FE; Nulty J; Burdis R; Kelly DJ
Acta Biomater; 2021 Jul; 128():130-142. PubMed ID: 33866035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Graphene oxide/alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration applications.
Choe G; Oh S; Seok JM; Park SA; Lee JY
Nanoscale; 2019 Dec; 11(48):23275-23285. PubMed ID: 31782460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Novel Plasma-Based Bioink Stimulates Cell Proliferation and Differentiation in Bioprinted, Mineralized Constructs.
Ahlfeld T; Cubo-Mateo N; Cometta S; Guduric V; Vater C; Bernhardt A; Akkineni AR; Lode A; Gelinsky M
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Mar; 12(11):12557-12572. PubMed ID: 32092249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. UV-Assisted 3D Bioprinting of Nanoreinforced Hybrid Cardiac Patch for Myocardial Tissue Engineering.
Izadifar M; Chapman D; Babyn P; Chen X; Kelly ME
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2018 Feb; 24(2):74-88. PubMed ID: 29050528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bioprinting of 3D Tissue Models Using Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink.
Pati F; Cho DW
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1612():381-390. PubMed ID: 28634957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. New Bioink Derived from Neonatal Chicken Bone Marrow Cells and Its 3D-Bioprinted Niche for Osteogenic Stimulators.
Yang WS; Kim WJ; Ahn JY; Lee J; Ko DW; Park S; Kim JY; Jang CH; Lim JM; Kim GH
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Nov; 12(44):49386-49397. PubMed ID: 32948093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nanoengineered Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue.
Chimene D; Miller L; Cross LM; Jaiswal MK; Singh I; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):15976-15988. PubMed ID: 32091189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Advancing Frontiers in Bone Bioprinting.
Ashammakhi N; Hasan A; Kaarela O; Byambaa B; Sheikhi A; Gaharwar AK; Khademhosseini A
Adv Healthc Mater; 2019 Apr; 8(7):e1801048. PubMed ID: 30734530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cell-laden four-dimensional bioprinting using near-infrared-triggered shape-morphing alginate/polydopamine bioinks.
Luo Y; Lin X; Chen B; Wei X
Biofabrication; 2019 Sep; 11(4):045019. PubMed ID: 31394520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computational model-informed design and bioprinting of cell-patterned constructs for bone tissue engineering.
Carlier A; Skvortsov GA; Hafezi F; Ferraris E; Patterson J; Koç B; Van Oosterwyck H
Biofabrication; 2016 May; 8(2):025009. PubMed ID: 27187017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laser printing of stem cells for biofabrication of scaffold-free autologous grafts.
Gruene M; Deiwick A; Koch L; Schlie S; Unger C; Hofmann N; Bernemann I; Glasmacher B; Chichkov B
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2011 Jan; 17(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 20673023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nanocomposite Clay-Based Bioinks for Skeletal Tissue Engineering.
Cidonio G; Glinka M; Kim YH; Dawson JI; Oreffo ROC
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2147():63-72. PubMed ID: 32840811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite Laponite-gelatin bioinks.
Cidonio G; Alcala-Orozco CR; Lim KS; Glinka M; Mutreja I; Kim YH; Dawson JI; Woodfield TBF; Oreffo ROC
Biofabrication; 2019 Jun; 11(3):035027. PubMed ID: 30991370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of multi-material architecture on the ex vivo osteochondral integration of bioprinted constructs.
Bedell ML; Wang Z; Hogan KJ; Torres AL; Pearce HA; Chim LK; Grande-Allen KJ; Mikos AG
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 155():99-112. PubMed ID: 36384222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 3D Bioprinting of Self-Standing Silk-Based Bioink.
Zheng Z; Wu J; Liu M; Wang H; Li C; Rodriguez MJ; Li G; Wang X; Kaplan DL
Adv Healthc Mater; 2018 Mar; 7(6):e1701026. PubMed ID: 29292585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application.
Ahlfeld T; Cidonio G; Kilian D; Duin S; Akkineni AR; Dawson JI; Yang S; Lode A; Oreffo ROC; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2017 Jul; 9(3):034103. PubMed ID: 28691691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Collagen/bioceramic-based composite bioink to fabricate a porous 3D hASCs-laden structure for bone tissue regeneration.
Kim W; Kim G
Biofabrication; 2019 Nov; 12(1):015007. PubMed ID: 31509811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.
Paxton N; Smolan W; Böck T; Melchels F; Groll J; Jungst T
Biofabrication; 2017 Nov; 9(4):044107. PubMed ID: 28930091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]