1884 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806193)
1. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
Hunter CR; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.
Souza P; Arehart K; Schoof T; Anderson M; Strori D; Balmert L
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1280-1292. PubMed ID: 30998547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable Speed Compressor over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor.
Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P; Seper E; Hau O
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):590-606. PubMed ID: 30420004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
Keidser G; Grant F
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
Rudner M; Lunner T; Behrens T; Thorén ES; Rönnberg J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
