1888 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806193)
41. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.
Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):618-28. PubMed ID: 21376003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.
Brody L; Wu YH; Stangl E
Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 30458521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of compression release time of a hearing aid on sentence recognition and the quality judgment of speech.
Shetty HN; Raju S
Noise Health; 2019; 21(103):232-241. PubMed ID: 32978360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.
Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):615-628. PubMed ID: 33027198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children.
Chong FY; Jenstad LM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):600-608. PubMed ID: 29072542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Listening Effort Measured Using a Dual-task Paradigm in Adults With Different Amounts of Noise Exposure.
Degeest S; Kestens K; Keppler H
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):899-912. PubMed ID: 34619684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Hearing aid noise suppression and working memory function.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):335-344. PubMed ID: 29316819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
Recker KL; Edwards BW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hearing aid experience and background noise affect the robust relationship between working memory and speech recognition in noise.
Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2020 Mar; 59(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31809220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
