423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806318)
1. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Reconstruction Algorithm vs Filtered Back Projection in the Detection of Hypodense Liver Lesions: Reader Performance and Preferences.
Dimmitt AM; Pelz JA; Albertson ME; Samson KK; Muinov LM; Oliveto JM; Hansen NJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 30762652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.
Gay F; Pavia Y; Pierrat N; Lasalle S; Neuenschwander S; Brisse HJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 23995879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of a New Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR)-V Algorithm on Image Quality in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.
Pontone G; Muscogiuri G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Mancini E; Verdecchia M; Campari A; Martini C; Gatti M; Fusini L; Bonfanti L; Consiglio E; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):1305-1313. PubMed ID: 29602723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Impact on Dose Reduction and Image Quality in Body Computed Tomography.
Gatti M; Marchisio F; Fronda M; Rampado O; Faletti R; Bergamasco L; Ropolo R; Fonio P
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 28937493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction veo and 80 kv in renal computed tomography angiography].
Ren ZL; Hu ZJ; Li D; Jia YJ; Yu N; Yu Y; Guo CY; Zhang XR; He TP
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 99(25):1953-1958. PubMed ID: 31269599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses.
Yoon MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Lee ES; Ahn SJ; Han JK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22992612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
