BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

821 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806321)

  • 1. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Law A; Kobi M; Paroder V; Rozenblit AM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 28806321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Ehman EC; Behr SC; Umetsu SE; Fidelman N; Yeh BM; Ferrell LD; Hope TA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 27193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.
    Schellhaas B; Hammon M; Strobel D; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Goertz RS; Cavallaro A; Janka R; Neurath MF; Uder M; Seuss H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4254-4264. PubMed ID: 29675659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System:: Substantial Discordance Between CT and MR for Imaging Classification of Hepatic Nodules.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 26777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
    Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim KW; Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6856-6867. PubMed ID: 33713172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can absolute arterial phase hyperenhancement improve sensitivity of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in indeterminate nodules on CT?
    Zafar S; Elbanna KY; Todd AWM; Guimaraes L; O'Brien C; Goel A; Kim TK; Khalili K
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2256-2268. PubMed ID: 37775590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Visualization Rates of LI-RADS Version 2014 Major Features With IV Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoxetate Disodium in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Allen BC; Ho LM; Jaffe TA; Miller CM; Mazurowski MA; Bashir MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 29629800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-arterial phase MRI depicts inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes in liver observations of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cunha GM; Hasenstab KA; Delgado T; Ichikawa S; Lee MH; Dautt Medina PM; Kim SJ; Lee YH; Kwon H; Sirlin CB; Fowler KJ
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7594-7604. PubMed ID: 33876298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2014 Algorithm and Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large International Multireader Study.
    Fowler KJ; Tang A; Santillan C; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Heiken J; Jha RC; Weinreb J; Hussain H; Mitchell DG; Bashir MR; Costa EAC; Cunha GM; Coombs L; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Brancatelli G; Yeh B; Sirlin CB
    Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):173-185. PubMed ID: 29091751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subtraction Images From Portal Venous Phase Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI for Observing Washout and Enhancing Capsule Features in LI-RADS Version 2018.
    Chung JW; Yu JS; Choi JM; Cho ES; Kim JH; Chung JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 31573851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classifying CT/MR findings in patients with suspicion of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of liver imaging reporting and data system and criteria-free Likert scale reporting models.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 26119393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
    van der Pol CB; McInnes MDF; Salameh JP; Levis B; Chernyak V; Sirlin CB; Bashir MR; Allen BC; Burke LMB; Choi JY; Choi SH; Forner A; Fraum TJ; Giamperoli A; Jiang H; Joo I; Kang Z; Kierans AS; Kang HJ; Khatri G; Kim JH; Kim MJ; Kim SY; Kim YY; Kwon H; Lee JM; Lewis SC; McGinty KA; Mulazzani L; Park MS; Piscaglia F; Podgórska J; Reiner CS; Ronot M; Rosiak G; Song B; Song JS; Tang A; Terzi E; Wang J; Wang W; Wilson SR; Yokoo T
    Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):326-335. PubMed ID: 34783596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of threshold growth as a major feature on LI-RADS categorization.
    Chernyak V; Kobi M; Flusberg M; Fruitman KC; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2089-2100. PubMed ID: 28352950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.
    Barth BK; Donati OF; Fischer MA; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo CA; Becker A; Seifert B; Reiner CS
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1145-53. PubMed ID: 27174029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interreader agreement and validation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system.
    Li J; Ling W; Chen S; Ma L; Yang L; Lu Q; Luo Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108685. PubMed ID: 31606712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Change in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Using Gadoxetate Disodium Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.
    Hope TA; Aslam R; Weinstein S; Yeh BM; Corvera CU; Monto A; Yee J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 27801693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging.
    Yao S; Wei Y; Ye Z; Chen J; Duan T; Zhang Z; Song B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jun; 59(6):2060-2070. PubMed ID: 34121266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
    Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.