168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28806932)
1. The impact of the lookback period and definition of confirmatory events on the identification of incident cancer cases in administrative data.
Czwikla J; Jobski K; Schink T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):122. PubMed ID: 28806932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer incidence using a French administrative database (general sample of health insurance beneficiaries).
Doat S; Samson S; Fagot-Campagna A; Tuppin P; Menegaux F
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2016 Jun; 64(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 27238161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of different lookback periods on the sociodemographic structure of the study population and on the estimation of incidence rates: analyses with German claims data.
Epping J; Geyer S; Tetzlaff J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):229. PubMed ID: 32917135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of second cancer within 5 years of diagnosis of a breast, prostate or colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
Cluze C; Delafosse P; Seigneurin A; Colonna M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Sep; 18(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 19436213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
; ;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer in Canada: Stage at diagnosis.
Bryan S; Masoud H; Weir HK; Woods R; Lockwood G; Smith L; Brierley J; Gospodarowicz M; Badets N
Health Rep; 2018 Dec; 29(12):21-25. PubMed ID: 30566206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of claims data for identifying cancer incidence in the Japan public health center-based prospective study for the next generation.
Ihira H; Goto A; Yamagishi K; Iso H; Iwasaki M; Sawada N; Tsugane S;
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Sep; 31(9):972-982. PubMed ID: 35726806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer incidence using administrative data: correction with sensitivity and specificity.
Couris CM; Polazzi S; Olive F; Remontet L; Bossard N; Gomez F; Schott AM; Mitton N; Colonna M; Trombert B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 19070463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases.
Baldi I; Vicari P; Di Cuonzo D; Zanetti R; Pagano E; Rosato R; Sacerdote C; Segnan N; Merletti F; Ciccone G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 18313562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of an Algorithm for Claims-based Incidence of Prostate Cancer.
Parlett LE; Beachler DC; Lanes S; Hoover RN; Cook MB
Epidemiology; 2019 May; 30(3):466-471. PubMed ID: 30829831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ascertaining invasive breast cancer cases; the validity of administrative and self-reported data sources in Australia.
Kemp A; Preen DB; Saunders C; Holman CD; Bulsara M; Rogers K; Roughead EE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():17. PubMed ID: 23399047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: implications for quality of care research.
Mallin K; Palis BE; Watroba N; Stewart AK; Walczak D; Singer J; Barron J; Blumenthal W; Haydu G; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 23357724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misclassification of incident hospitalized and outpatient heart failure in administrative claims data: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
Camplain R; Kucharska-Newton A; Cuthbertson CC; Wright JD; Alonso A; Heiss G
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):421-428. PubMed ID: 28120359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of incident breast and colorectal cancer cases from an administrative healthcare database in Catalonia, Spain.
Escribà JM; Banqué M; Macià F; Gálvez J; Esteban L; Pareja L; Clèries R; Sanz X; Castells X; Borrás JM; Ribes J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jun; 22(6):943-952. PubMed ID: 31586294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidemiology of the four major cancers in South Dakota.
Clarke J
S D Med; 2010; Spec No():6-14. PubMed ID: 20397486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No reduced risk of overall, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancer with metformin therapy in diabetic patients: database analyses from Germany and the UK.
Kowall B; Stang A; Rathmann W; Kostev K
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Aug; 24(8):865-74. PubMed ID: 26132313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [ICD coding quality for outpatient cancer diagnoses in SHI claims data].
Czwikla J; Domhoff D; Giersiepen K
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2016 Dec; 118-119():48-55. PubMed ID: 27987568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of algorithms to identify incident cancer cases by using French health administrative databases.
Ajrouche A; Estellat C; De Rycke Y; Tubach F
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Aug; 26(8):935-944. PubMed ID: 28485129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
