These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28807044)

  • 21. MetaBCC-LR: metagenomics binning by coverage and composition for long reads.
    Wickramarachchi A; Mallawaarachchi V; Rajan V; Lin Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i3-i11. PubMed ID: 32657364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metagenomics Bioinformatic Pipeline.
    Garfias-Gallegos D; Zirión-Martínez C; Bustos-Díaz ED; Arellano-Fernández TV; Lovaco-Flores JA; Espinosa-Jaime A; Avelar-Rivas JA; Sélem-Mójica N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2512():153-179. PubMed ID: 35818005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
    Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SprayNPray: user-friendly taxonomic profiling of genome and metagenome contigs.
    Garber AI; Armbruster CR; Lee SE; Cooper VS; Bomberger JM; McAllister SM
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):202. PubMed ID: 35279076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Struo: a pipeline for building custom databases for common metagenome profilers.
    de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Ley RE; Youngblut ND
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2314-2315. PubMed ID: 31778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.
    Sun S; Jones RB; Fodor AA
    Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 32241293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MOCAT: a metagenomics assembly and gene prediction toolkit.
    Kultima JR; Sunagawa S; Li J; Chen W; Chen H; Mende DR; Arumugam M; Pan Q; Liu B; Qin J; Wang J; Bork P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47656. PubMed ID: 23082188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrating taxonomic signals from MAGs and contigs improves read annotation and taxonomic profiling of metagenomes.
    Hauptfeld E; Pappas N; van Iwaarden S; Snoek BL; Aldas-Vargas A; Dutilh BE; von Meijenfeldt FAB
    Nat Commun; 2024 Apr; 15(1):3373. PubMed ID: 38643272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cataloguing the taxonomic origins of sequences from a heterogeneous sample using phylogenomics: applications in adventitious agent detection.
    Charlebois RL; Ng SH; Gisonni-Lex L; Mallet L
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(6):602-18. PubMed ID: 25475635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy.
    De Sanctis B; Money D; Pedersen MW; Durbin R
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Aug; 22(6):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35285150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
    Whelan FJ; Surette MG
    Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating metagenomics tools for genome binning with real metagenomic datasets and CAMI datasets.
    Yue Y; Huang H; Qi Z; Dou HM; Liu XY; Han TF; Chen Y; Song XJ; Zhang YH; Tu J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):334. PubMed ID: 32723290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification.
    Ye SH; Siddle KJ; Park DJ; Sabeti PC
    Cell; 2019 Aug; 178(4):779-794. PubMed ID: 31398336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wochenende - modular and flexible alignment-based shotgun metagenome analysis.
    Rosenboom I; Scheithauer T; Friedrich FC; Pörtner S; Hollstein L; Pust MM; Sifakis K; Wehrbein T; Rosenhahn B; Wiehlmann L; Chhatwal P; Tümmler B; Davenport CF
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):748. PubMed ID: 36368923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
    Zhang Q
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MG-RAST version 4-lessons learned from a decade of low-budget ultra-high-throughput metagenome analysis.
    Meyer F; Bagchi S; Chaterji S; Gerlach W; Grama A; Harrison T; Paczian T; Trimble WL; Wilke A
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1151-1159. PubMed ID: 29028869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Large-scale machine learning for metagenomics sequence classification.
    Vervier K; Mahé P; Tournoud M; Veyrieras JB; Vert JP
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 26589281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CAMITAX: Taxon labels for microbial genomes.
    Bremges A; Fritz A; McHardy AC
    Gigascience; 2020 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 31909794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. COCACOLA: binning metagenomic contigs using sequence COmposition, read CoverAge, CO-alignment and paired-end read LinkAge.
    Lu YY; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):791-798. PubMed ID: 27256312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hecatomb: an integrated software platform for viral metagenomics.
    Roach MJ; Beecroft SJ; Mihindukulasuriya KA; Wang L; Paredes A; Cárdenas LAC; Henry-Cocks K; Lima LFO; Dinsdale EA; Edwards RA; Handley SA
    Gigascience; 2024 Jan; 13():. PubMed ID: 38832467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.