201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28807044)
21. Metagenomics Bioinformatic Pipeline.
Garfias-Gallegos D; Zirión-Martínez C; Bustos-Díaz ED; Arellano-Fernández TV; Lovaco-Flores JA; Espinosa-Jaime A; Avelar-Rivas JA; Sélem-Mójica N
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2512():153-179. PubMed ID: 35818005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. SprayNPray: user-friendly taxonomic profiling of genome and metagenome contigs.
Garber AI; Armbruster CR; Lee SE; Cooper VS; Bomberger JM; McAllister SM
BMC Genomics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):202. PubMed ID: 35279076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Struo: a pipeline for building custom databases for common metagenome profilers.
de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Ley RE; Youngblut ND
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2314-2315. PubMed ID: 31778148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.
Sun S; Jones RB; Fodor AA
Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 32241293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MOCAT: a metagenomics assembly and gene prediction toolkit.
Kultima JR; Sunagawa S; Li J; Chen W; Chen H; Mende DR; Arumugam M; Pan Q; Liu B; Qin J; Wang J; Bork P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47656. PubMed ID: 23082188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Integrating taxonomic signals from MAGs and contigs improves read annotation and taxonomic profiling of metagenomes.
Hauptfeld E; Pappas N; van Iwaarden S; Snoek BL; Aldas-Vargas A; Dutilh BE; von Meijenfeldt FAB
Nat Commun; 2024 Apr; 15(1):3373. PubMed ID: 38643272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cataloguing the taxonomic origins of sequences from a heterogeneous sample using phylogenomics: applications in adventitious agent detection.
Charlebois RL; Ng SH; Gisonni-Lex L; Mallet L
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(6):602-18. PubMed ID: 25475635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy.
De Sanctis B; Money D; Pedersen MW; Durbin R
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Aug; 22(6):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35285150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluating metagenomics tools for genome binning with real metagenomic datasets and CAMI datasets.
Yue Y; Huang H; Qi Z; Dou HM; Liu XY; Han TF; Chen Y; Song XJ; Zhang YH; Tu J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):334. PubMed ID: 32723290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Wochenende - modular and flexible alignment-based shotgun metagenome analysis.
Rosenboom I; Scheithauer T; Friedrich FC; Pörtner S; Hollstein L; Pust MM; Sifakis K; Wehrbein T; Rosenhahn B; Wiehlmann L; Chhatwal P; Tümmler B; Davenport CF
BMC Genomics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):748. PubMed ID: 36368923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification.
Ye SH; Siddle KJ; Park DJ; Sabeti PC
Cell; 2019 Aug; 178(4):779-794. PubMed ID: 31398336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
Zhang Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MG-RAST version 4-lessons learned from a decade of low-budget ultra-high-throughput metagenome analysis.
Meyer F; Bagchi S; Chaterji S; Gerlach W; Grama A; Harrison T; Paczian T; Trimble WL; Wilke A
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1151-1159. PubMed ID: 29028869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CAMITAX: Taxon labels for microbial genomes.
Bremges A; Fritz A; McHardy AC
Gigascience; 2020 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 31909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Large-scale machine learning for metagenomics sequence classification.
Vervier K; Mahé P; Tournoud M; Veyrieras JB; Vert JP
Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 26589281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hecatomb: an integrated software platform for viral metagenomics.
Roach MJ; Beecroft SJ; Mihindukulasuriya KA; Wang L; Paredes A; Cárdenas LAC; Henry-Cocks K; Lima LFO; Dinsdale EA; Edwards RA; Handley SA
Gigascience; 2024 Jan; 13():. PubMed ID: 38832467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. COCACOLA: binning metagenomic contigs using sequence COmposition, read CoverAge, CO-alignment and paired-end read LinkAge.
Lu YY; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):791-798. PubMed ID: 27256312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. KMCP: accurate metagenomic profiling of both prokaryotic and viral populations by pseudo-mapping.
Shen W; Xiang H; Huang T; Tang H; Peng M; Cai D; Hu P; Ren H
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36579886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
