These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28807251)

  • 21. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
    Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
    McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Di Nisio M; Smidt N; van Rijn JC; Bossuyt PM
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 16477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig L; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Kressel HY; Rifai N; Golub RM; Altman DG; Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF;
    BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5527. PubMed ID: 26511519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.
    Tatsioni A; Zarin DA; Aronson N; Samson DJ; Flamm CR; Schmid C; Lau J
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. PubMed ID: 15968029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG;
    Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):639-50. PubMed ID: 14515429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Bertens LC; van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5605. PubMed ID: 24162938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multivariable adjustments counteract spectrum and test review bias in accuracy studies.
    Bachmann LM; ter Riet G; Weber WE; Kessels AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):357-361.e2. PubMed ID: 18620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methodological deficits in diagnostic research using '-omics' technologies: evaluation of the QUADOMICS tool and quality of recently published studies.
    Parker LA; Gómez Saez N; Lumbreras B; Porta M; Hernández-Aguado I
    PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11419. PubMed ID: 20625481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic accuracy of flow rate testing in urology.
    Patel HR; Garcia-Montes F; Christopher N; Reeves BC; Emberton M
    BJU Int; 2003 Jul; 92(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12823384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review.
    Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Moreno-Nunez P; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Steingart KR; González Peña LDM; Buitrago-Garcia D; Kaunelis D; Emparanza JI; Alonso-Coello P; Tricco AC; Zamora J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():98-105. PubMed ID: 31521724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to report a research study.
    Cronin P; Rawson JV; Heilbrun ME; Lee JM; Kelly AM; Sanelli PC; Bresnahan BW; Paladin AM
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1088-116. PubMed ID: 25107863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies.
    Freeman K; Szczepura A; Osipenko L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 19081172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy.
    Johnson NP; Bagrie EM; Coomarasamy A; Bhattacharya S; Shelling AN; Jessop S; Farquhar C; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1472-80. PubMed ID: 17176280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.