These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28807441)
1. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti. Hauri P; Schneider U Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV). Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co. Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: Comparison of peripheral patient dose from MR-guided Hauri P; Hälg RA; Schneider U Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3788-3793. PubMed ID: 28437010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source. Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry. Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of the intrinsic energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources relative to 60Co. Reed JL; Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Micka JA; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122103. PubMed ID: 25471976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response. Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the variation of energy spectra with depth in the dosimetry of 192Ir using LiF TLD. Meigooni AS; Meli JA; Nath R Phys Med Biol; 1988 Oct; 33(10):1159-70. PubMed ID: 3194446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed dose measurements from a D'Arienzo M; Pimpinella M; De Coste V; Capogni M; Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Iaccarino G; Ungania S; Strigari L Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():127-133. PubMed ID: 31901837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays. Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental determination of the photon-energy dependent dose-to-water response of TLD600 and TLD700 (LiF:Mg,Ti) thermoluminescence detectors. Schwahofer A; Feist H; Georg H; Häring P; Schlegel W Z Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 26972816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose response of various radiation detectors to synchrotron radiation. Kron T; Duggan L; Smith T; Rosenfeld A; Butson M; Kaplan G; Howlett S; Hyodo K Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3235-59. PubMed ID: 9832014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti. Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields. Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Out-of-field mean photon energy and dose from 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams measured with TLD-300 and TLD-100 dosimeters. López-Guadalupe VM; Rodríguez-Laguna A; Poitevin-Chacón MA; López-Pineda E; Brandan ME Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6567-6577. PubMed ID: 34528262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance. Liuzzi R; Savino F; D'Avino V; Pugliese M; Cella L PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139287. PubMed ID: 26427065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV. Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds. Rodriguez M; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114301. PubMed ID: 25370677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of lateral dose profile measurements in a small field using TLDs. Zhang B; Zhu J; Li Y; Chen S; Chen L; Liu X Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):N47-57. PubMed ID: 25586905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]