462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28807441)
1. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
Hauri P; Schneider U
Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: Comparison of peripheral patient dose from MR-guided
Hauri P; Hälg RA; Schneider U
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3788-3793. PubMed ID: 28437010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of the intrinsic energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources relative to 60Co.
Reed JL; Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Micka JA; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122103. PubMed ID: 25471976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the variation of energy spectra with depth in the dosimetry of 192Ir using LiF TLD.
Meigooni AS; Meli JA; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 1988 Oct; 33(10):1159-70. PubMed ID: 3194446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed dose measurements from a
D'Arienzo M; Pimpinella M; De Coste V; Capogni M; Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Iaccarino G; Ungania S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():127-133. PubMed ID: 31901837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental determination of the photon-energy dependent dose-to-water response of TLD600 and TLD700 (LiF:Mg,Ti) thermoluminescence detectors.
Schwahofer A; Feist H; Georg H; Häring P; Schlegel W
Z Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 26972816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose response of various radiation detectors to synchrotron radiation.
Kron T; Duggan L; Smith T; Rosenfeld A; Butson M; Kaplan G; Howlett S; Hyodo K
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3235-59. PubMed ID: 9832014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields.
Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Out-of-field mean photon energy and dose from 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams measured with TLD-300 and TLD-100 dosimeters.
López-Guadalupe VM; Rodríguez-Laguna A; Poitevin-Chacón MA; López-Pineda E; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6567-6577. PubMed ID: 34528262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance.
Liuzzi R; Savino F; D'Avino V; Pugliese M; Cella L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139287. PubMed ID: 26427065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds.
Rodriguez M; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114301. PubMed ID: 25370677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of lateral dose profile measurements in a small field using TLDs.
Zhang B; Zhu J; Li Y; Chen S; Chen L; Liu X
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):N47-57. PubMed ID: 25586905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
