These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28807684)

  • 1. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the velotron racermate cycle ergometer to measure anaerobic power.
    Astorino TA; Cottrell T
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 33(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22187386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wingate Anaerobic Test Reliability on the Velotron With Ice Hockey Players.
    Bringhurst RF; Wagner DR; Schwartz S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1716-1722. PubMed ID: 29385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower Wingate Test Power Outcomes From "All-Out" Pretest Pedaling Cadence Compared With Moderate Cadence.
    Lunn WR; Zenoni MA; Crandall IH; Dress AE; Berglund ML
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2367-73. PubMed ID: 26200017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a Flying Versus Stationary Start on Wingate Test Outcomes Using an Electromagnetically-Braked Cycle Ergometer in Advanced Resistance-Trained Males.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2018; 11(4):980-986. PubMed ID: 30338018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Micklewright D; Alkhatib A; Beneke R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Apr; 96(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 16468058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of performance in repeated sprint cycling tests.
    Watt KK; Hopkins WG; Snow RJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2002 Dec; 5(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 12585619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postactivation potentiation effect of overloaded cycling on subsequent cycling Wingate performance.
    Doma K; Leicht AS; Schumann M; Nagata A; Senzaki K; Woods CE
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Feb; 59(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 29308849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inertial effects on mechanically braked Wingate power calculations.
    Reiser RF; Broker JP; Peterson ML
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9):1660-4. PubMed ID: 10994921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of asynchronous and synchronous arm cranking during the Wingate test.
    Lovell DI; Mason D; Delphinus E; McLellan C
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2011 Sep; 6(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21911866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes.
    McGawley K; Bishop D
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Nov; 98(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 16955291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the variability of performance on Wingate anaerobic tests in children aged 6-12 years.
    Naughton G; Carlson J; Fairweather I
    Int J Sports Med; 1992 Oct; 13(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 1459745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of a laboratory based 20-km time trial evaluation in competitive cyclists using the Velotron Pro ergometer.
    Sporer BC; McKenzie DC
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Nov; 28(11):940-4. PubMed ID: 17497571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry.
    McNaughton L; Thomas D
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8814511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of passive versus active recovery on power output over six repeated wingate sprints.
    Lopez EI; Smoliga JM; Zavorsky GS
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 25412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test.
    Talbot C; Kay TD; Walker N; Price MJ
    Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 24950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caffeine mouth rinse has no effects on anaerobic energy yield during a Wingate Test.
    Marinho AH; Mendes EV; Vilela RA; Bastos-Silva VJ; Araujo GG; Balikian P
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2020 Jan; 60(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 31640317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of elliptical chainrings on 10 km cycling time trial performance.
    Peiffer JJ; Abbiss CR
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2010 Dec; 5(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 21266731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.