These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28809723)

  • 41. Efficacy of pressure parameters obtained during contrast medium-induced submaximal hyperemia in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis.
    Kanaji Y; Murai T; Lee T; Matsuda J; Usui E; Araki M; Niida T; Ichijo S; Hamaya R; Yonetsu T; Kimura S; Kakuta T
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():207-13. PubMed ID: 26397413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Contrast-induced Hyperemia as an Alternative to Drug-induced Hyperemia in the Evaluation of the Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Lesions.
    Shiode N; Okimoto T; Tamekiyo H; Kawase T; Yamane K; Kagawa Y; Fujii Y; Ueda Y; Hironobe N; Kato Y; Hayashi Y
    Intern Med; 2017; 56(3):253-257. PubMed ID: 28154267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relationship between optical coherence tomography derived intraluminal and intramural criteria and haemodynamic relevance as determined by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses of patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Reith S; Battermann S; Jaskolka A; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R; Marx N; Burgmaier M
    Heart; 2013 May; 99(10):700-7. PubMed ID: 23543283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
    Ben-Dor I; Torguson R; Deksissa T; Bui AB; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial.
    Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.
    Brosh D; Higano ST; Lennon RJ; Holmes DR; Lerman A
    Am Heart J; 2005 Aug; 150(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16086940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Usefulness of coronary fractional flow reserve measurements in guiding clinical decisions in intermediate or equivocal left main coronary stenoses.
    Courtis J; Rodés-Cabau J; Larose E; Potvin JM; Déry JP; Larochellière RD; Côté M; Cousterousse O; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Rinfret S; Bertrand OF
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Apr; 103(7):943-9. PubMed ID: 19327420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
    van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound parameters and fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis of left anterior descending artery: intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis.
    Yang HM; Tahk SJ; Lim HS; Yoon MH; Choi SY; Choi BJ; Jin XJ; Hwang GS; Park JS; Shin JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Feb; 83(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23804359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine to assess fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gili S; Barbero U; Errigo D; De Luca G; Biondi-Zoccai G; Leone AM; Iannaccone M; Montefusco A; Omedé P; Moretti C; D'Amico M; Gaita F; D'Ascenzo F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Jun; 19(6):274-283. PubMed ID: 29553991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve.
    Kolli KK; Arif I; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Back LH; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Effat MA; Banerjee RK
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 24791716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Diffuse coronary artery disease among other atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by coronary computed tomography angiography for predicting coronary vessel-specific ischemia by fractional flow reserve.
    Rizvi A; Hartaigh BÓ; Danad I; Han D; Lee JH; Gransar H; Szymonifka J; Lin FY; Min JK
    Atherosclerosis; 2017 Mar; 258():145-151. PubMed ID: 28168977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve.
    Rudzinski W; Waller AH; Rusovici A; Dehnee A; Nasur A; Benz M; Sanchez S; Klapholz M; Kaluski E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 22961876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of effectiveness of high-dose intracoronary adenosine versus intravenous administration on the assessment of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary heart disease.
    López-Palop R; Carrillo P; Frutos A; Cordero A; Agudo P; Mashlab S; Bertomeu-Martínez V
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 May; 111(9):1277-83. PubMed ID: 23415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve?
    Casella G; Leibig M; Schiele TM; Schrepf R; Seelig V; Stempfle HU; Erdin P; Rieber J; König A; Siebert U; Klauss V
    Am Heart J; 2004 Oct; 148(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 15459587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Wong DT; Ko BS; Cameron JD; Nerlekar N; Leung MC; Malaiapan Y; Crossett M; Leong DP; Worthley SG; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(12):1271-9. PubMed ID: 23414792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Angiographic severity does not correlate with fractional flow reserve in heavily calcified coronary arteries.
    Johnson PM; Madamanchi C; Sharalaya ZM; Iqbal Z; Gehi AK; Kaul P; Stouffer GA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 27465149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Importance of guiding catheter disengagement during measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis.
    Aminian A; Dolatabadi D; Lefebvre P; Khalil G; Zimmerman R; Michalakis G; Lalmand J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 85(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 24909128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions.
    Tu S; Echavarria-Pinto M; von Birgelen C; Holm NR; Pyxaras SA; Kumsars I; Lam MK; Valkenburg I; Toth GG; Li Y; Escaned J; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 25819180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.