790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28809759)
1. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TOPAS Monte Carlo simulation for double scattering proton therapy and dosimetric evaluation.
Liu H; Li Z; Slopsema R; Hong L; Pei X; Xu XG
Phys Med; 2019 Jun; 62():53-62. PubMed ID: 31153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Souris K; Li S; Kang M; Barragan Montero AM; Janssens G; Lin A; Garver E; Ainsley C; Taylor P; Xiao Y; Lin L
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5631-5642. PubMed ID: 30295950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.
Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extension of matRad with a modified microdosimetric kinetic model for carbon ion treatment planning: Comparison with Monte Carlo calculation.
Yoon E; Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; Jung S
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5884-5896. PubMed ID: 37162309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double scattering and pencil beam scanning Monte Carlo workflows for proton therapy retrospective studies on radiation-induced toxicities.
Leite AMM; Bonfrate A; Da Fonseca A; Lansonneur P; Alapetite C; Mammar H; De Marzi L
Cancer Radiother; 2023 Jun; 27(4):319-327. PubMed ID: 37164897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fred: a GPU-accelerated fast-Monte Carlo code for rapid treatment plan recalculation in ion beam therapy.
Schiavi A; Senzacqua M; Pioli S; Mairani A; Magro G; Molinelli S; Ciocca M; Battistoni G; Patera V
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7482-7504. PubMed ID: 28873069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):127-137. PubMed ID: 31763759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction.
van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2816-26. PubMed ID: 17821989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proton range verification in inhomogeneous tissue: Treatment planning system vs. measurement vs. Monte Carlo simulation.
Kim DH; Cho S; Jo K; Shin E; Hong CS; Han Y; Suh TS; Lim DH; Choi DH
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193904. PubMed ID: 29505589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.
Perl J; Shin J; Schumann J; Faddegon B; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6818-37. PubMed ID: 23127075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
