These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28811394)

  • 1. Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing/certification examinations.
    Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():17. PubMed ID: 28811394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conducting simulation studies for computerized adaptive testing using SimulCAT: an instructional piece.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():20. PubMed ID: 30114899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The transition of the national certification examination from paper and pencil to computer adaptive testing.
    Zaglaniczny KL
    AANA J; 1996 Feb; 64(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8928607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of computerized adaptive testing in medical education.
    Huh S
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 21(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25813107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-hoc simulation study of computerized adaptive testing for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Choi J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():14. PubMed ID: 29770677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():7. PubMed ID: 29575849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. North American Veterinary Licensing Examination pacing study.
    Subhiyah RG; Boyce JR
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21135405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of real data and simulated data analysis of a stopping rule based on the standard error of measurement in computerized adaptive testing for medical examinations in Korea: a psychometric study.
    Seo DG; Choi J; Kim J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2024; 21():18. PubMed ID: 38977033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting Retake Policy: Analyzing the Success Rates of Examinees With Multiple Attempts on the United States Medical Licensing Examination.
    Rubright JD; Ong TQ; Jodoin MG; Johnson DA; Barone MA
    Acad Med; 2022 Aug; 97(8):1219-1225. PubMed ID: 35442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer adaptive testing.
    Gershon RC
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):109-27. PubMed ID: 15701948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship of individual examinee characteristics and acceptability of smart device-based testing to test score in the practice test of the Korea Emergency Medicine Technician Licensing Examination.
    Lim EY; Yim MK; Huh S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():33. PubMed ID: 30586957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment in the context of licensure and certification.
    Norcini JJ; Lipner RS; Grosso LJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25 Suppl 1():S62-7. PubMed ID: 24246109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.
    Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen P; Wang C; Xin T; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 28130937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Varying levels of difficulty index of skills-test items randomly selected by examinees on the Korean emergency medical technician licensing examination.
    Koh B; Hong S; Kim SS; Hyun JS; Baek M; Moon J; Kwon H; Kim G; Min S; Kang GH
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():5. PubMed ID: 26883810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.
    Sorrel MA; Barrada JR; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227196. PubMed ID: 31923227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item-saving assessment of self-care performance in children with developmental disabilities: A prospective caregiver-report computerized adaptive test.
    Chen CT; Chen YL; Lin YC; Hsieh CL; Tzeng JY; Chen KL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193936. PubMed ID: 29561879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and Validation of an Item Bank for Drug Dependence Measurement Using Computer Adaptive Testing.
    Liu S; Tu D; Cai Y
    Subst Use Misuse; 2020; 55(14):2291-2304. PubMed ID: 32772651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.