BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28812151)

  • 1. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
    Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histopathological comparison of aspiration and biopsy needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with subepithelial lesions.
    Watanabe M; Okuwaki K; Kida M; Tadehara M; Adachi K; Masutani H; Tamaki A; Imaizumi H; Iwai T; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Kurosu T; Koizumi W
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 49(7):856-863. PubMed ID: 33885229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy on the diagnosis of subepithelial tumors: A propensity score-matching analysis.
    Inoue T; Okumura F; Sano H; Mizushima T; Tsukamoto H; Fujita Y; Ibusuki M; Kitano R; Kobayashi Y; Ishii N; Ito K; Yoneda M
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30171772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm).
    Sekine M; Miura T; Fujiwara J; Uehara T; Asano T; Matsumoto S; Miyatani H; Mashima H
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
    Dwyer J; Pantanowitz L; Ohori NP; Pai RK; Vrbin C; Brand RE; Monaco SE
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study.
    Kim DH; Kim GH; Cho CM; Park CH; Na SY; Kim TH; Cho YK; Kim JH; Seo DW;
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):151. PubMed ID: 30340469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Lesions in a Multicenter, Randomized Trial.
    Nagula S; Pourmand K; Aslanian H; Bucobo JC; Gonda TA; Gonzalez S; Goodman A; Gross SA; Ho S; DiMaio CJ; Kim MK; Pais S; Poneros JM; Robbins DH; Schnoll-Sussman F; Sethi A; Buscaglia JM;
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1307-1313.e1. PubMed ID: 28624647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Ramai D; Ofosu A; Muscatiello N; Mangiavillano B; Lamonaca L; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Gkolfakis P; Stasi E; Samanta J; Dhar J; Cotsoglou C; Castillo JL; Antonini F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2022 May; 54(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 35264310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.
    Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):895-911.e13. PubMed ID: 38360118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
    Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.