459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28812275)
1. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016).
Lei L; Zhang Y
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1409-1420. PubMed ID: 28889329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. China cracks down on fake peer reviews.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
Hadi MA
Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.
Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing.
Van Nuland SE; Rogers KA
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):392-394. PubMed ID: 27911990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting Hijacked Journals by Using Classification Algorithms.
Andoohgin Shahri M; Jazi MD; Borchardt G; Dadkhah M
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):655-668. PubMed ID: 28397175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20388454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical aspects in medical publishing in Belgium.
Moreels TG
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2018; 81(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 29562377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.
Ferris LE; Winker MA
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28694719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.
Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.
Kotchoubey B; Bütof S; Sitaram R
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):829-35. PubMed ID: 25156788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview.
Qi X; Deng H; Guo X
Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills.
Seifert R
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 394(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 33547901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them.
Hemmat Esfe M; Wongwises S; Asadi A; Akbari M
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):821-4. PubMed ID: 25230907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caging the pack.
Nelson B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 124(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 27294405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing.
Mavrogenis AF; Panagopoulos GN; Megaloikonomos PD; Panagopoulos VN; Mauffrey C; Quaile A; Scarlat MM
Orthopedics; 2018 Mar; 41(2):e176-e183. PubMed ID: 29377051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
