These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28812275)
1. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review. Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016). Lei L; Zhang Y Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1409-1420. PubMed ID: 28889329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. China cracks down on fake peer reviews. Cyranoski D Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity. Hadi MA Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science. Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting Hijacked Journals by Using Classification Algorithms. Andoohgin Shahri M; Jazi MD; Borchardt G; Dadkhah M Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):655-668. PubMed ID: 28397175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications]. Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R Neurologia; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20388454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical aspects in medical publishing in Belgium. Moreels TG Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2018; 81(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 29562377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process. Haug CJ N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Ferris LE; Winker MA Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28694719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions]. Maisonneuve H Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study. Kotchoubey B; Bütof S; Sitaram R Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):829-35. PubMed ID: 25156788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Qi X; Deng H; Guo X Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills. Seifert R Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 394(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 33547901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them. Hemmat Esfe M; Wongwises S; Asadi A; Akbari M Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):821-4. PubMed ID: 25230907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caging the pack. Nelson B Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 124(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 27294405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]