BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

909 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28812421)

  • 1. Right hemispatial ipsilesional neglect with chronic right hemisphere strokes.
    Williamson JB; Lamb DG; Burtis DB; Haque S; M Zilli E; Kesayan T; Harciarek M; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):347-356. PubMed ID: 28812421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-tasking uncovers right spatial neglect and extinction in chronic left-hemisphere stroke patients.
    Blini E; Romeo Z; Spironelli C; Pitteri M; Meneghello F; Bonato M; Zorzi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Nov; 92():147-157. PubMed ID: 26948071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralesional distractors enhance ipsilesional target processing after right-hemispheric stroke.
    Vossel S; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2016 May; 78():115-124. PubMed ID: 27035700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A kinematic analysis of distractor interference effects during visually guided action in spatial neglect.
    Corben LA; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 11311034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ipsilesional versus contralesional neglect depends on attentional demands.
    Na DL; Adair JC; Choi SH; Seo DW; Kang Y; Heilman KM
    Cortex; 2000 Sep; 36(4):455-67. PubMed ID: 11059449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple object tracking and pupillometry reveal deficits in both selective and intensive attention in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Walle KM; Nordvik JE; Espeseth T; Becker F; Laeng B
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 41(3):270-289. PubMed ID: 30426866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralesional cross-over in chronic neglect: visual search patterns reveal neglect of the ipsilesional hemispace.
    Gall C; Günther T; Fuhrmans F; Sabel BA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 31(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 22951712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left hand movements and right hemisphere activation in unilateral spatial neglect: a test of the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis.
    Gainotti G; Perri R; Cappa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 11931938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Chokron S; Peyrin C; Perez C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 May; 128():305-314. PubMed ID: 29551364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke.
    Kunkel Genannt Bode L; Schulte AS; Hauptmann B; Münte TF; Sprenger A; Machner B
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 36384816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laterally directed arm movements and right unilateral neglect after left hemisphere damage.
    Bartolomeo P; Chokron S; Gainotti G
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1013-21. PubMed ID: 11440754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory neglect in children following perinatal stroke.
    Martin K; Trauner DA
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 359():878-885. PubMed ID: 29953906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Horizontal space misrepresentation in unilateral brain damage. I. Visual and proprioceptive-motor influences in left unilateral neglect.
    Doricchi F; Galati G; DeLuca L; Nico D; D'Olimpio F
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1107-17. PubMed ID: 11931915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Chronic Right Hemispheric Damage on the Allocation of Spatial Attention: Alterations of Accuracy and Reliability.
    Finney GR; Williamson JB; Brandon Burtis D; Drago V; Mizuno T; Jeong Y; Crucian GP; Haque S; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2015 May; 21(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 26073665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ipsilesional attentional-approach neglect or crossover effect.
    Drago V; Jeong Y; Crucian GP; Fitzgerald DB; Finney GR; Mizuno T; Pisani F; Heilman KM
    Neurocase; 2006 Aug; 12(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 17000588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Biscaro V; Corbo M; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ipsilesional intentional neglect and the effect of cueing.
    Schwartz RL; Barrett AM; Kim M; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 1999 Dec; 53(9):2017-22. PubMed ID: 10599774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased attentional load moves the left to the right.
    Bonato M; Cutini S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 26594943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.
    Machner B; Dorr M; Sprenger A; von der Gablentz J; Heide W; Barth E; Helmchen C
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2415-25. PubMed ID: 22750122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.