135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28812633)
1. Diversity begets diversity in competition for space.
Maynard DS; Bradford MA; Lindner DL; van Diepen LTA; Frey SD; Glaeser JA; Crowther TW
Nat Ecol Evol; 2017 May; 1(6):156. PubMed ID: 28812633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences.
Godoy O; Stouffer DB; Kraft NJB; Levine JM
Ecology; 2017 May; 98(5):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 28241383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity-function relationship.
Maynard DS; Crowther TW; Bradford MA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11464-11469. PubMed ID: 29073072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diversity Increases Indirect Interactions, Attenuates the Intensity of Competition, and Promotes Coexistence.
Aschehoug ET; Callaway RM
Am Nat; 2015 Oct; 186(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 26655569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Competitive intransitivity among species in biotic communities].
Permogorskiĭ MS
Zh Obshch Biol; 2014; 75(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 25771680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks?
Laird RA; Schamp BS
Ecology; 2008 Jan; 89(1):237-47. PubMed ID: 18376565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Species coexistence, intransitivity, and topological variation in competitive tournaments.
Laird RA; Schamp BS
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 18948120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness.
Soliveres S; Maestre FT; Ulrich W; Manning P; Boch S; Bowker MA; Prati D; Delgado-Baquerizo M; Quero JL; Schöning I; Gallardo A; Weisser W; Müller J; Socher SA; García-Gómez M; Ochoa V; Schulze ED; Fischer M; Allan E
Ecol Lett; 2015 Aug; 18(8):790-798. PubMed ID: 26032242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competitive intransitivity, population interaction structure, and strategy coexistence.
Laird RA; Schamp BS
J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 365():149-58. PubMed ID: 25454011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence that niche specialization explains species-energy relationships in lake fish communities.
Mason NW; Irz P; Lanoiselée C; Mouillot D; Argillier C
J Anim Ecol; 2008 Mar; 77(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 18179548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?
Michalet R; Brooker RW; Cavieres LA; Kikvidze Z; Lortie CJ; Pugnaire FI; Valiente-Banuet A; Callaway RM
Ecol Lett; 2006 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 16796565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Habitat loss alters effects of intransitive higher-order competition on biodiversity: a new metapopulation framework.
Li Y; Bearup D; Liao J
Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 287(1940):20201571. PubMed ID: 33259756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental fluctuations facilitate species co-existence and increase decomposition in communities of wood decay fungi.
Toljander YK; Lindahl BD; Holmer L; Högberg NO
Oecologia; 2006 Jul; 148(4):625-31. PubMed ID: 16538482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities.
Mayfield MM; Levine JM
Ecol Lett; 2010 Sep; 13(9):1085-93. PubMed ID: 20576030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecological versatility and the assembly of multiple competitors: cautionary notes for assembly inferences.
Saito VS; Laroche F; Siqueira T; Pavoine S
Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 29479674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games.
Reichenbach T; Mobilia M; Frey E
Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7157):1046-9. PubMed ID: 17728757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The three-species problem: Incorporating competitive asymmetry and intransitivity in modern coexistence theory.
Ranjan R; Koffel T; Klausmeier CA
Ecol Lett; 2024 Apr; 27(4):e14426. PubMed ID: 38603592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence.
Gallien L; Zimmermann NE; Levine JM; Adler PB
Ecol Lett; 2017 Jul; 20(7):791-800. PubMed ID: 28547799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threesomes destabilise certain relationships: multispecies interactions between wood decay fungi in natural resources.
Hiscox J; Savoury M; Toledo S; Kingscott-Edmunds J; Bettridge A; Waili NA; Boddy L
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 93(3):. PubMed ID: 28175239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evidence for strong stabilizing forces at high functional diversity of aquatic microbial communities.
Carrara F; Giometto A; Seymour M; Rinaldo A; Altermatt F
Ecology; 2015 May; 96(5):1340-50. PubMed ID: 26236847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
