These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28813796)

  • 1. Feedforward model based arm weight compensation with the rehabilitation robot ARMin.
    Just F; Ozen O; Tortora S; Riener R; Rauter G
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():72-77. PubMed ID: 28813796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human arm weight compensation in rehabilitation robotics: efficacy of three distinct methods.
    Just F; Özen Ö; Tortora S; Klamroth-Marganska V; Riener R; Rauter G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Feb; 17(1):13. PubMed ID: 32024528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
    Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices.
    Bertomeu-Motos A; Blanco A; Badesa FJ; Barios JA; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29458397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Using Event-Related Desynchronization-Synchronization during Robot-Assisted Movement.
    Caimmi M; Visani E; Digiacomo F; Scano A; Chiavenna A; Gramigna C; Molinari Tosatti L; Franceschetti S; Molteni F; Panzica F
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7051340. PubMed ID: 27057546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
    Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
    Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
    Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online learning and adaptation of patient support during ADL training.
    Guidali M; Schlink P; Duschau-Wicke A; Riener R
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975434. PubMed ID: 22275635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive hybrid robotic system for rehabilitation of reaching movement after a brain injury: a usability study.
    Resquín F; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Ibáñez J; Brunetti F; Dimbwadyo I; Carrasco L; Alves S; Gonzalez-Alted C; Gomez-Blanco A; Pons JL
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 14(1):104. PubMed ID: 29025427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rehabilitation for hemiplegia using an upper limb training system based on a force direction.
    Ogata K; Hirabayashi Y; Kubota K; Hasegawa Y; Tsuji T
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():533-538. PubMed ID: 28813875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving robotic stroke rehabilitation by incorporating neural intent detection: Preliminary results from a clinical trial.
    Sullivan JL; Bhagat NA; Yozbatiran N; Paranjape R; Losey CG; Grossman RG; Contreras-Vidal JL; Francisco GE; O'Malley MK
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():122-127. PubMed ID: 28813805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematic data analysis for post-stroke patients following bilateral versus unilateral rehabilitation with an upper limb wearable robotic system.
    Kim H; Miller LM; Fedulow I; Simkins M; Abrams GM; Byl N; Rosen J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 22855233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and kinematical performance analysis of the 7-DOF upper-limb exoskeleton toward improving human-robot interface in active and passive movement training.
    Meng Q; Fei C; Jiao Z; Xie Q; Dai Y; Fan Y; Shen Z; Yu H
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(5):1167-1182. PubMed ID: 35342067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The combined action of a passive exoskeleton and an EMG-controlled neuroprosthesis for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: First results of the RETRAINER project.
    Ambrosini E; Ferrante S; Zajc J; Bulgheroni M; Baccinelli W; d'Amico E; Schauer T; Wiesener C; Russold M; Gfoehler M; Puchinger M; Weber M; Becker S; Krakow K; Rossini M; Proserpio D; Gasperini G; Molteni F; Ferrigno G; Pedrocchi A
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():56-61. PubMed ID: 28813793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and kinematic analysis of a novel upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Zeiaee A; Soltani-Zarrin R; Langari R; Tafreshi R
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():759-764. PubMed ID: 28813911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and optimization of PARTNER: a parallel actuated robotic trainer for NEuroRehabilitation.
    Taheri H; Goodwin SA; Tigue JA; Perry JC; Wolbrecht ET
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2128-2132. PubMed ID: 28268752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation.
    Gomez-Rodriguez M; Grosse-Wentrup M; Hill J; Gharabaghi A; Scholkopf B; Peters J
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975385. PubMed ID: 22275589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. sEMG-based joint force control for an upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton robot.
    Li Z; Wang B; Sun F; Yang C; Xie Q; Zhang W
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 May; 18(3):1043-50. PubMed ID: 24235314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction force and motion estimators facilitating impedance control of the upper limb rehabilitation robot.
    Mancisidor A; Zubizarreta A; Cabanes I; Bengoa P; Jung JH
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():561-566. PubMed ID: 28813879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.