These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28813853)

  • 1. Towards human-knee orthosis interaction based on adaptive impedance control through stiffness adjustment.
    Figueiredo J; Felix P; Santos CP; Moreno JC
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():406-411. PubMed ID: 28813853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of a wearable perturbator for human knee impedance estimation during gait.
    Tucker MR; Moser A; Lambercy O; Sulzer J; Gassert R
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650372. PubMed ID: 24187191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis replicates soleus but not gastrocnemius muscle function during stance in gait: Insights for orthosis prescription.
    Arch ES; Stanhope SJ; Higginson JS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):606-16. PubMed ID: 26209424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A wearable robotic knee orthosis for gait training: a case-series of hemiparetic stroke survivors.
    Wong CK; Bishop L; Stein J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 22082495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stiffness Perception During Active Ankle and Knee Movement.
    Azocar AF; Rouse EJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 64(12):2949-2956. PubMed ID: 28410094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active impedance control of a knee-joint orthosis during swing phase.
    El Zahraa Wehbi F; Huo W; Amirat Y; Rafei ME; Khalil M; Mohammed S
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():435-440. PubMed ID: 28813858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of a knee ankle foot orthosis incorporating an active knee mechanism on gait of a person with poliomyelitis.
    Arazpour M; Chitsazan A; Bani MA; Rouhi G; Ghomshe FT; Hutchins SW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Oct; 37(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 23327836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gait evaluation of new powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis in able-bodied persons: a pilot study.
    Arazpour M; Ahmadi F; Bani MA; Hutchins SW; Bahramizadeh M; Ghomshe FT; Kashani RV
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 23660383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of migration of instantaneous centre of knee orthosis rotation during gait - in vivo displacement measurements in two experimental variants.
    Bogucki AJ
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2014; 16(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 24728794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of powered gait orthosis on walking in individuals with paraplegia.
    Arazpour M; Ahmadi Bani M; Kashani RV; Tabatabai Ghomshe F; Mousavi ME; Hutchins SW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23172910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bio-inspired control of joint torque and knee stiffness in a robotic lower limb exoskeleton using a central pattern generator.
    Schrade SO; Nager Y; Wu AR; Gassert R; Ijspeert A
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1387-1394. PubMed ID: 28814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A wearable robotic orthosis with a spring-assist actuator.
    Seungmin Jung ; Chankyu Kim ; Jisu Park ; Dongyoub Yu ; Jaehwan Park ; Junho Choi
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5051-5054. PubMed ID: 28269403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive impedance control of a robotic orthosis for gait rehabilitation.
    Hussain S; Xie SQ; Jamwal PK
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2013 Jun; 43(3):1025-34. PubMed ID: 23193241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timing of intermittent torque control with wire-driven gait training robot lifting toe trajectory for trip avoidance.
    Miyake T; Kobayashi Y; Fujie MG; Sugano S
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():320-325. PubMed ID: 28813839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modified Computed Torque Control of a Robotic Orthosis for Gait Rehabilitation.
    Dao QT; Yamamoto SI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1719-1722. PubMed ID: 30440726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Issues in impedance selection and input devices for multijoint powered orthotics.
    Lemay MA; Hogan N; van Dorsten JW
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1998 Mar; 6(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 9535529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An intrinsically compliant robotic orthosis for treadmill training.
    Hussain S; Xie SQ; Jamwal PK; Parsons J
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1448-53. PubMed ID: 22421099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary kinematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
    Yakimovich T; Lemaire ED; Kofman J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 16949186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human-robot interaction: kinematics and muscle activity inside a powered compliant knee exoskeleton.
    Knaepen K; Beyl P; Duerinck S; Hagman F; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Nov; 22(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24846650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-degree-of-freedom motor-powered gait orthosis for spinal cord injury patients.
    Ohta Y; Yano H; Suzuki R; Yoshida M; Kawashima N; Nakazawa K
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Aug; 221(6):629-39. PubMed ID: 17937202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.