111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28813903)
1. Let's do this together: Bi-Manu-Interact, a novel device for studying human haptic interactive behavior.
Ivanova E; Krause A; Schalicke M; Schellhardt F; Jankowski N; Achner J; Schmidt H; Joebges M; Kruger J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():708-713. PubMed ID: 28813903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "Beam-Me-In Strategy" - remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy.
Baur K; Rohrbach N; Hermsdörfer J; Riener R; Klamroth-Marganska V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):85. PubMed ID: 31296226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expanding stroke telerehabilitation services to rural veterans: a qualitative study on patient experiences using the robotic stroke therapy delivery and monitoring system program.
Cherry CO; Chumbler NR; Richards K; Huff A; Wu D; Tilghman LM; Butler A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 26135221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BeMobil: Developing a user-friendly and motivating telerehabilitation system for motor relearning after stroke.
Minge M; Ivanova E; Lorenz K; Joost G; Thuring M; Kruger J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():870-875. PubMed ID: 28813930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stroke Rehabilitation: Therapy Robots and Assistive Devices.
Klamroth-Marganska V
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1065():579-587. PubMed ID: 30051408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. H-Man: a planar, H-shape cabled differential robotic manipulandum for experiments on human motor control.
Campolo D; Tommasino P; Gamage K; Klein J; Hughes CM; Masia L
J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Sep; 235():285-97. PubMed ID: 25058923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MIT-Skywalker: On the use of a markerless system.
Goncalves RS; Hamilton T; Krebs HI
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():205-210. PubMed ID: 28813819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Users perspectives on interactive distance technology enabling home-based motor training for stroke patients.
Ehn M; Hansson P; Sjölinder M; Boman IL; Folke M; Sommerfeld D; Borg J; Palmcrantz S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 211():145-52. PubMed ID: 25980861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How do strength and coordination recovery interact after stroke? A computational model for informing robotic training.
Norman SL; Lobo-Prat J; Reinkensmeyer DJ
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():181-186. PubMed ID: 28813815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and optimization of PARTNER: a parallel actuated robotic trainer for NEuroRehabilitation.
Taheri H; Goodwin SA; Tigue JA; Perry JC; Wolbrecht ET
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2128-2132. PubMed ID: 28268752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compensating for telecommunication delays during robotic telerehabilitation.
Consoni LJ; Siqueira AAG; Krebs HI
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():812-817. PubMed ID: 28813920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploration of Two Training Paradigms Using Forced Induced Weight Shifting With the Tethered Pelvic Assist Device to Reduce Asymmetry in Individuals After Stroke: Case Reports.
Bishop L; Khan M; Martelli D; Quinn L; Stein J; Agrawal S
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 96(10 Suppl 1):S135-S140. PubMed ID: 28661914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MIT-Skywalker: Evaluating comfort of bicycle/saddle seat.
Goncalves RS; Hamilton T; Daher AR; Hirai H; Krebs HI
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():516-520. PubMed ID: 28813872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing a Wearable Ankle Rehabilitation Robotic Device for in-Bed Acute Stroke Rehabilitation.
Ren Y; Wu YN; Yang CY; Xu T; Harvey RL; Zhang LQ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jun; 25(6):589-596. PubMed ID: 27337720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The BioMotionBot: a robotic device for applications in human motor learning and rehabilitation.
Bartenbach V; Sander C; Pöschl M; Wilging K; Nelius T; Doll F; Burger W; Stockinger C; Focke A; Stein T
J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Mar; 213(2):282-97. PubMed ID: 23276545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On stability and passivity of haptic devices characterized by a series elastic actuation and considerable end-point mass.
Oblak J; Matjačić Z
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975497. PubMed ID: 22275694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model-based assistance-as-needed for robotic movement therapy after stroke.
Taheri H; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Wolbrecht ET
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2124-2127. PubMed ID: 28268751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed.
Emken JL; Benitez R; Reinkensmeyer DJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 4():8. PubMed ID: 17391527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid position and orientation tracking for a passive rehabilitation table-top robot.
Wojewoda KK; Culmer PR; Gallagher JF; Jackson AE; Levesley MC
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():702-707. PubMed ID: 28813902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
