BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28813913)

  • 1. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
    Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
    Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices.
    Bertomeu-Motos A; Blanco A; Badesa FJ; Barios JA; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29458397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.
    Sugar TG; He J; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Herman R; Huang H; Schultz RS; Herring DE; Wanberg J; Balasubramanian S; Swenson P; Ward JA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 17894266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
    Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effector force requirements to enable robotic systems to provide assisted exercise in people with upper limb impairment after stroke.
    Jackson AE; Culmer PR; Levesley MC; Cozens JA; Makower SG; Bhakta BB
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975391. PubMed ID: 22275595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance-based robotic assistance during rhythmic arm exercises.
    Leconte P; Ronsse R
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 27623806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic biomechanical model for assessing and monitoring robot-assisted upper-limb therapy.
    Abdullah HA; Tarry C; Datta R; Mittal GS; Abderrahim M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 17551857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
    Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feedforward model based arm weight compensation with the rehabilitation robot ARMin.
    Just F; Ozen O; Tortora S; Riener R; Rauter G
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():72-77. PubMed ID: 28813796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. System Framework of Robotics in Upper Limb Rehabilitation on Poststroke Motor Recovery.
    Zhang K; Chen X; Liu F; Tang H; Wang J; Wen W
    Behav Neurol; 2018; 2018():6737056. PubMed ID: 30651892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid position and orientation tracking for a passive rehabilitation table-top robot.
    Wojewoda KK; Culmer PR; Gallagher JF; Jackson AE; Levesley MC
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():702-707. PubMed ID: 28813902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of complementing a robotic upper limb rehabilitation system with video games on the engagement of the participants: a study focusing on muscle activities.
    Li C; Rusák Z; Horváth I; Ji L
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Dec; 37(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 25221845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES.
    Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Burridge JH; Chappell PH; Lewin PL; Rogers E
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Apr; 31(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 18640865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and optimization of PARTNER: a parallel actuated robotic trainer for NEuroRehabilitation.
    Taheri H; Goodwin SA; Tigue JA; Perry JC; Wolbrecht ET
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2128-2132. PubMed ID: 28268752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic Modeling and Interactive Performance of PARM: A Parallel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Using Impedance Control for Patients after Stroke.
    Guang H; Ji L; Shi Y; Misgeld BJE
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():8647591. PubMed ID: 29850004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
    Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
    Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.