These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28814013)
21. PCA and deep learning based myoelectric grasping control of a prosthetic hand. Li C; Ren J; Huang H; Wang B; Zhu Y; Hu H Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Aug; 17(1):107. PubMed ID: 30081927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visuomotor behaviors and performance in a dual-task paradigm with and without vibrotactile feedback when using a myoelectric controlled hand. Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S Assist Technol; 2018; 30(5):274-280. PubMed ID: 28628379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating the effect of non-invasive force feedback on prosthetic grasp force modulation in participants with and without limb loss. Barontini F; Van Straaten M; Catalano MG; Thoreson A; Lopez C; Lennon R; Bianchi M; Andrews K; Santello M; Bicchi A; Zhao K PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285081. PubMed ID: 37141211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm. Hasson CJ; Manczurowsky J J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 12():31. PubMed ID: 25879430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning. Vasan G; Pilarski PM IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control? Ninu A; Dosen S; Muceli S; Rattay F; Dietl H; Farina D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24801625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. Pasquina PF; Evangelista M; Carvalho AJ; Lockhart J; Griffin S; Nanos G; McKay P; Hansen M; Ipsen D; Vandersea J; Butkus J; Miller M; Murphy I; Hankin D J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 244():85-93. PubMed ID: 25102286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm. Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study. Gonzalez J; Soma H; Sekine M; Yu W J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():33. PubMed ID: 22682425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Control Architecture for Grasp Strength Regulation in Myocontrolled Robotic Hands Using Vibrotactile Feedback: Preliminary Results. Meattini R; Biagiotti L; Palli G; De Gregorio D; Melchiorri C IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1272-1277. PubMed ID: 31374804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Real-time myoelectric control of a multi-fingered hand prosthesis using principal components analysis. Matrone GC; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Magenes G J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():40. PubMed ID: 22703711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electromyogram synergy control of a dexterous artificial hand to unscrew and screw objects. Kent BA; Karnati N; Engeberg ED J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 11():41. PubMed ID: 24655413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Myoelectric Prosthesis Users Improve Performance Time and Accuracy Using Vibrotactile Feedback When Visual Feedback Is Disturbed. Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 99(11):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 29935153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users. Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Interaction Between Feedback Type and Learning in Routine Grasping With Myoelectric Prostheses. Wilke MA; Hartmann C; Schimpf F; Farina D; Dosen S IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(3):645-654. PubMed ID: 31870991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of calibration parameters on the control of a myoelectric hand prosthesis using EMG feedback. Tchimino J; Markovic M; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S J Neural Eng; 2021 Jun; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34082406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A compact solution for vibrotactile proprioceptive feedback of wrist rotation and hand aperture. Marinelli A; Boccardo N; Canepa M; Di Domenico D; Gruppioni E; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L; Chiappalone M; Semprini M; Dosen S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 Aug; 21(1):142. PubMed ID: 39135110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving bimanual interaction with a prosthesis using semi-autonomous control. Volkmar R; Dosen S; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Baum M; Markovic M J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 16(1):140. PubMed ID: 31727087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Closed-Loop Control of a Multifunctional Myoelectric Prosthesis With Full-State Anatomically Congruent Electrotactile Feedback. Garenfeld MA; Strbac M; Jorgovanovic N; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():2090-2100. PubMed ID: 37058389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A compact system for simultaneous stimulation and recording for closed-loop myoelectric control. Garenfeld MA; Jorgovanovic N; Ilic V; Strbac M; Isakovic M; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 34034762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]