These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28814780)

  • 1. Adaptive simulations, towards interactive protein-ligand modeling.
    Lecina D; Gilabert JF; Guallar V
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8466. PubMed ID: 28814780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).
    Hafner J
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.
    Liu W; Liu Z; Liu H; Westerhoff LM; Zheng Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5645-5665. PubMed ID: 36282990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coupled protein-ligand dynamics in truncated hemoglobin N from atomistic simulations and transition networks.
    Cazade PA; Berezovska G; Meuwly M
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1850(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 25224733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ligand diffusion in proteins via enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics.
    Rydzewski J; Nowak W
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Dec; 22-23():58-74. PubMed ID: 28410930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Enhanced Binding Free Energy Estimation through Markov State Models.
    Gilabert JF; Gracia Carmona O; Hogner A; Guallar V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5529-5539. PubMed ID: 32644807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binding Mode and Induced Fit Predictions for Prospective Computational Drug Design.
    Grebner C; Iegre J; Ulander J; Edman K; Hogner A; Tyrchan C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Apr; 56(4):774-87. PubMed ID: 26974351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Monte Carlo Based Technique To Study DNA-Ligand Interactions.
    Cabeza de Vaca I; Lucas MF; Guallar V
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Dec; 11(12):5598-605. PubMed ID: 26642982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models.
    Cappel D; Hall ML; Lenselink EB; Beuming T; Qi J; Bradner J; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2388-2400. PubMed ID: 28024402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging Computational Methods for the Rational Discovery of Allosteric Drugs.
    Wagner JR; Lee CT; Durrant JD; Malmstrom RD; Feher VA; Amaro RE
    Chem Rev; 2016 Jun; 116(11):6370-90. PubMed ID: 27074285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.
    Gill SC; Lim NM; Grinaway PB; Rustenburg AS; Fass J; Ross GA; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(21):5579-5598. PubMed ID: 29486559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preparation and refinement of model protein-ligand complexes.
    Orry AJ; Abagyan R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():351-73. PubMed ID: 22323230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein flexibility and ligand recognition: challenges for molecular modeling.
    Spyrakis F; BidonChanal A; Barril X; Luque FJ
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(2):192-210. PubMed ID: 20939788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid approaches to molecular simulation.
    Ho BK; Perahia D; Buckle AM
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2012 Jun; 22(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 22633678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
    Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations.
    Rohs R; Bloch I; Sklenar H; Shakked Z
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(22):7048-57. PubMed ID: 16352865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility.
    Wagner JR; Sørensen J; Hensley N; Wong C; Zhu C; Perison T; Amaro RE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Sep; 13(9):4584-4592. PubMed ID: 28800393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery.
    Gioia D; Bertazzo M; Recanatini M; Masetti M; Cavalli A
    Molecules; 2017 Nov; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 29165360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frontiers in molecular dynamics simulations of DNA.
    Pérez A; Luque FJ; Orozco M
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Feb; 45(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21830782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.