These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28815084)

  • 21. Effects of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy on Circulating Tumor Cell Level in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.
    Wang HB; Guo Q; Li YH; Sun ZQ; Li TT; Zhang WX; Xiang SS; Li HF
    World J Surg; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1655-62. PubMed ID: 27020921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Cuesta MA; Daams F; Roig Garcia J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Aug; 266(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 28187044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effects of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy on circulating tumor cells in patients with esophageal cancer].
    Guo X; Wu YZ; Jia LF; Li YL; Yan YS; Chen QQ
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2018 Mar; 38(3):318-323. PubMed ID: 29643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Oncological and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study.
    Wang W; Zhou Y; Feng J; Mei Y
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(9):15983-90. PubMed ID: 26629102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhou C; Ma G; Li X; Li J; Yan Y; Liu P; He J; Ren Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 13():269. PubMed ID: 26338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Is it truly less invasive?
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2019 Mar; 3(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 30923783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
    Xiong WL; Li R; Lei HK; Jiang ZY
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Mar; 87(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 26477880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
    Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-Term Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Study from Finland and Sweden.
    Kauppila JH; Helminen O; Kytö V; Gunn J; Lagergren J; Sihvo E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):326-332. PubMed ID: 29094248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Maas KW; Cuesta MA; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Roig J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; Gisbertz SS; Biere SS; van der Peet DL; Klinkenbijl JH; Hollmann MW; de Lange ES; Bonjer HJ
    World J Surg; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1986-93. PubMed ID: 26037024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Adaption of surgical procedure in the treatment of submucosal esophageal cancer].
    Hao S; Li Z; Fang W; Mao T; Zhao H; Zhong C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 18(9):885-8. PubMed ID: 26404683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
    Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
    Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.