These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28815468)

  • 1. A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection.
    Hendl T
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Sep; 14(3):427-438. PubMed ID: 28815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.
    Browne TK
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 28299587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".
    Shahvisi A
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):123-137. PubMed ID: 29368172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework.
    de Melo-Martín I
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Mar; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 23678627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons.
    Blyth E; Frith L; Crawshaw M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16 Suppl 1():41-5. PubMed ID: 18348789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The argument for unlimited procreative liberty: a feminist critique.
    Ryan MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):6-12. PubMed ID: 2211090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male or female, we will create them: the ethics of sex selection for non-medical reasons.
    Heyd D
    Ethical Perspect; 2003; 10(3-4):204-14. PubMed ID: 16206460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Procreative liberty: the case for preconception sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2003; 7(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 14656397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex selection in India: Why a ban is not justified.
    Sterri AB
    Dev World Bioeth; 2020 Sep; 20(3):150-156. PubMed ID: 31642181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chance, choice and control: lay debate on prenatal social sex selection.
    Scully JL; Banks S; Shakespeare TW
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16459006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual dimorphism and the value of feminist bioethics.
    Matchett NJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 20582821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive choice in Islam: gender and state in Iran and Tunisia.
    Obermeyer CM
    Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 8209394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A feminist understanding of sex-selective abortion: solely a matter of choice?
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10(2):161-223. PubMed ID: 12739593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rights and procreative liberty.
    Schroeder D
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):325. PubMed ID: 17695626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hannah Arendt, feminist theorizing, and the debate over new reproductive technologies.
    Curtis KF
    Polity; 1995; 28(2):159-87. PubMed ID: 11655203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ethics of sex selection: a comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex selection services.
    Puri S; Nachtigall RD
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2107-14. PubMed ID: 19342036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?
    Smith MK; Taylor-Sands M
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 29396799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive Autonomy and Social Sex Selection: A Chance of a Choice?
    Boyd K
    J Law Med; 2018 Jul; 25(4):1106-1118. PubMed ID: 29978688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection.
    McDougall R
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):601-5. PubMed ID: 16199604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Against procreative moral rights.
    Earl J
    Bioethics; 2022 Jun; 36(5):569-575. PubMed ID: 34908181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.