These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28816123)

  • 1. Genome editing: science, ethics, and public engagement.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10095):625. PubMed ID: 28816123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public engagement and communication: who is in charge?
    Boëte C
    EMBO Rep; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 29247079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human genome editing: ask whether, not how.
    Hurlbut JB
    Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7738):135. PubMed ID: 30602779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethink public engagement for gene editing.
    Burall S
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7697):438-439. PubMed ID: 29565402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on
    Angrist M; Barrangou R; Baylis F; Brokowski C; Burgio G; Caplan A; Chapman CR; Church GM; Cook-Deegan R; Cwik B; Doudna JA; Evans JH; Greely HT; Hercher L; Hurlbut JB; Hynes RO; Ishii T; Kiani S; Lee LH; Levrier G; Liu DR; Lunshof JE; Macintosh KL; Mathews DJH; Meslin EM; Mills PHR; Montoliu L; Musunuru K; Nicol D; O'Neill H; Qiu R; Ranisch R; Sherkow JS; Soni S; Terry S; Topol E; Williamson R; Zhang F; Davies K
    CRISPR J; 2020 Oct; 3(5):332-349. PubMed ID: 33095048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation?
    Blasimme A
    AMA J Ethics; 2019 Dec; 21(12):E1065-1070. PubMed ID: 31876471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How should the applications of genome editing be assessed and regulated?
    Fears R; Ter Meulen V
    Elife; 2017 Apr; 6():. PubMed ID: 28375079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Should Clinicians Do to Engage the Public About Gene Editing?
    Alsaigh T; Nicholson L; Topol E
    AMA J Ethics; 2019 Dec; 21(12):E1089-1097. PubMed ID: 31876474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. License heritable gene editing like medical cannabis.
    Julian H
    Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7762):446. PubMed ID: 31239565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CRISPR-baby scientist fails to satisfy critics.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7734):13-14. PubMed ID: 30514937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geneva Statement on Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Need for Course Correction.
    Andorno R; Baylis F; Darnovsky M; Dickenson D; Haker H; Hasson K; Lowthorp L; Annas GJ; Bourgain C; Drabiak K; Graumann S; Grüber K; Kaiser M; King D; Kollek R; MacKellar C; Nie JB; Obasogie OK; Tyebally Fang M; Werner-Felmayer G; Zuscinova J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):351-354. PubMed ID: 32014274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Take stock of research ethics in human genome editing.
    Nature; 2017 Sep; 549(7672):307. PubMed ID: 28933445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Do We Really Think About Human Germline Genome Editing, and What Does It Mean for Medicine?
    Musunuru K; Lagor WR; Miano JM
    Circ Cardiovasc Genet; 2017 Oct; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28974517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inside the circle of trust.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2019 Aug; 365(6452):430-437. PubMed ID: 31371593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good.
    Capps B; Chadwick R; Joly Y; Mulvihill JJ; Lysaght T; Zwart H
    Hum Genomics; 2017 Aug; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 28851444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Building Capacity for a Global Genome Editing Observatory: Institutional Design.
    Saha K; Hurlbut JB; Jasanoff S; Ahmed A; Appiah A; Bartholet E; Baylis F; Bennett G; Church G; Cohen IG; Daley G; Finneran K; Hurlbut W; Jaenisch R; Lwoff L; Kimes JP; Mills P; Moses J; Park BS; Parens E; Salzman R; Saxena A; Simmet H; Simoncelli T; Snead OC; Rajan KS; Truog RD; Williams P; Woopen C
    Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 36(8):741-743. PubMed ID: 29891181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9 raises important ethical questions, says advisory body.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2016 Sep; 354():i5318. PubMed ID: 27694221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical issues in human germline gene editing: a perspective from China.
    Zhang D; Lie RK
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2018 Dec; 36(1-4):23-35. PubMed ID: 30593648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Global citizen deliberation on genome editing.
    Dryzek JS; Nicol D; Niemeyer S; Pemberton S; Curato N; Bächtiger A; Batterham P; Bedsted B; Burall S; Burgess M; Burgio G; Castelfranchi Y; Chneiweiss H; Church G; Crossley M; de Vries J; Farooque M; Hammond M; He B; Mendonça R; Merchant J; Middleton A; Rasko JEJ; Van Hoyweghen I; Vergne A
    Science; 2020 Sep; 369(6510):1435-1437. PubMed ID: 32943515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. China sets new ethics rules for human studies.
    Normile D
    Science; 2023 Mar; 379(6636):970. PubMed ID: 36893237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.