131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28816540)
1. A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIEWS WHEN ASSESSING QUALITY OF INFORMATION ON PITUITARY ADENOMA AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET.
Druce I; Williams C; Baggoo C; Keely E; Malcolm J
Endocr Pract; 2017 Oct; 23(10):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 28816540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?
McKearney RM; MacKinnon RC; Smith M; Baker R
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):984-989. PubMed ID: 30353795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus.
Cutler C; Peng T; Stinson J; Tucker L; Boneparth A; Klein Gitelman M; Moorthy LN
Lupus; 2018 Apr; 27(5):762-770. PubMed ID: 29256340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.
Alsaiari A; Joury A; Aljuaid M; Wazzan M; Pines JM
J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 27130549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Googling fibroids: A critical appraisal of information available on the internet.
Hirsch M; Wojtaszewska A; Saridogan E; Mavrelos D; Barker C; Duffy JMN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jul; 250():224-230. PubMed ID: 32473505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery.
Wasserman M; Baxter NN; Rosen B; Burnstein M; Halverson AL
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jan; 57(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 24316947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet.
Bowden DJ; Yap LC; Sheppard DG
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
