597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28817235)
1. Discrepant HPV/cytology cotesting results: Are there differences between cytology-negative versus HPV-negative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Tracht JM; Davis AD; Fasciano DN; Eltoum IA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Oct; 125(10):795-805. PubMed ID: 28817235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Safaeian M; Solomon D; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Castle P
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17540804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group.
Lytwyn A; Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Daya D; Chapman W; Ellis N; Roth P; Lorincz AT; Gafni A
CMAJ; 2000 Sep; 163(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 11022584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the human papillomavirus test in combination with the Papanicolaou test useful for management of patients with diagnoses of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions?
Lee NW; Kim D; Park JT; Kim A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Nov; 125(11):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11698001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.
Verguts J; Bronselaer B; Donders G; Arbyn M; Van Eldere J; Drijkoningen M; Poppe W
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1303-7. PubMed ID: 16978225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with hybrid capture II: colposcopy and histologic human papillomavirus correlation.
Lonky NM; Felix JC; Naidu YM; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 12636951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat cytology and human papillomavirus screening strategies in detecting preinvasive cervical lesions.
Li K; Yin R
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(5):e435. PubMed ID: 25654377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-year risk of high-grade CIN for women aged 30 years or older who undergo baseline Pap cytology and HPV co-screening.
Guo M; Khanna A; Wang J; Dawlett MA; Kologinczak TL; Lyons GR; Bassett RL; Sneige N; Gong Y; Bevers TB
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):644-651. PubMed ID: 28498639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
