These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28817736)

  • 21. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating.
    Okuda M; Nikaido T; Maruoka R; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):38-46; discussion 47-8. PubMed ID: 17244149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal hybrid layer in Class V restorations.
    Prati C; Pashley DH; Chersoni S; Mongiorgi R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 11203821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):277-82. PubMed ID: 10850246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 15451243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dye staining gap test: an alternative method for assessing marginal gap formation in composite restorations.
    Caroline Bruschi Alonso R; Maria Correr G; Gonçalves Cunha L; Flávia Sanches Borges A; Maria Puppin-Rontani R; Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Jun; 64(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 16809190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Root-surface gap-formation with RMGIC restorations minimized by reduced P/L ratio of the first increment and delayed polishing.
    Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 16225915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ.
    Kanca J; Greitzer G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 19508264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U; García-Godoy F; Finger WJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
    Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Schroeder M; Balducci I; Versluis A; Ballester RY
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of C-factor, flexural modulus and viscous flow on gap formation in resin composite restorations.
    Moreira da Silva E; dos Santos GO; Guimarães JG; Barcellos Ade A; Sampaio EM
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 17695608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.