265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28818322)
1. Stability of biodegradable metal (Mg-Ca-Zn alloy) screws compared with absorbable polymer and titanium screws for sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using the finite element analysis model.
Lee JH; Han HS; Kim YC; Lee JY; Lee BK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1639-1646. PubMed ID: 28818322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of magnesium-based resorbable metallic screw system in a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy model using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JY; Lee JW; Pang KM; Kim HE; Kim SM; Lee JH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 72(2):402.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24280169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D vector analysis of mandibular condyle stability in mandibular setback surgery with bicortical bioabsorbable screw fixation.
Lee JH; Kim SM; Lee BK; Jeon JH; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e105-10. PubMed ID: 24172189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
Oh JS; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.
Albougha S; Albogha MH; Darwich MA; Darwich K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 25784154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of stress distribution in resorbable screw fixation system: three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular setback surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Choi JP; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1104-9. PubMed ID: 20613578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different screw fixation techniques and screw diameters in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis method.
Sindel A; Demiralp S; Colok G
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):683-91. PubMed ID: 24889187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
Demircan S; Uretürk EU; Apaydın A; Şen S
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The establishment of digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and stability analysis of 3 different fixation methods].
Yin XM; Zhang JW; Ren XX; Xu GX; Liu X
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Jun; 22(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 23852049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study by finite element method of the mechanical stress of selected biodegradable osteosynthesis screws in sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Maurer P; Holweg S; Knoll WD; Schubert J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 40(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 11883977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition.
Kim YI; Park SB; Jung YH; Hwang DS; Lee JY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2893-8. PubMed ID: 22726704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of a tandem screw configuration in sagittal split osteotomy using biodegradable osteosynthesis screws.
Maurer P; Schubert J; Holweg S
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 12390008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
