These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28818564)

  • 1. Validity of a smartphone protractor to measure sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity.
    Kunkle WA; Madden M; Potts S; Fogelson J; Hershman S
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1559-1564. PubMed ID: 28818564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters.
    Lafage R; Ferrero E; Henry JK; Challier V; Diebo B; Liabaud B; Lafage V; Schwab F
    Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2493-502. PubMed ID: 26343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of prone intraoperative measurements of global spinal alignment.
    Vaynrub M; Hirsch BP; Tishelman J; Vasquez-Montes D; Buckland AJ; Errico TJ; Protopsaltis TS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Aug; 29(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 29775162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability Analysis of Spino-Pelvic Parameters in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparison of Whole Spine and Pelvic Radiographs.
    Chen RQ; Hosogane N; Watanabe K; Funao H; Okada E; Fujita N; Hikata T; Iwanami A; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Abe T; Toyama Y; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Feb; 41(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 26579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of sagittal pelvic parameters: the effect of lumbosacral instrumentation and measurement experience.
    Vila-Casademunt A; Pellisé F; Acaroglu E; Pérez-Grueso FJ; Martín-Buitrago MP; Sanli T; Yakici S; de Frutos AG; Matamalas A; Sánchez-Márquez JM; Obeid I; Yaman O; Bagó J;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(4):E253-8. PubMed ID: 25494319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of a Smartphone Application (Sagittalmeter Pro) for the Measurement of Sagittal Balance Parameters.
    Lee JB; Kim IS; Lee JJ; Park JH; Cho CB; Yang SH; Sung JH; Hong JT
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e8-e15. PubMed ID: 30557655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance].
    Rillardon L; Levassor N; Guigui P; Wodecki P; Cardinne L; Templier A; Skalli W
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 May; 89(3):218-27. PubMed ID: 12844045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.
    Ames CP; Smith JS; Eastlack R; Blaskiewicz DJ; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Bess S; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Gupta M; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis TS; Fu KM; Hart R; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Fehlings MG; Deviren V; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 26273762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of Spinopelvic Parameters on Standing Lateral Lumbar Radiographs: Validity and Reliability.
    Chung NS; Jeon CH; Lee HD; Won SH
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Mar; 30(2):E119-E123. PubMed ID: 27764059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability in Assessing Spinopelvic Parameters With Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Among Spine Surgeons.
    Khalsa AS; Mundis GM; Yagi M; Fessler RG; Bess S; Hosogane N; Park P; Than KD; Daniels A; Iorio J; Ledesma JB; Tran S; Eastlack RK;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jun; 43(12):813-816. PubMed ID: 29846363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter/Intraobserver Reliability of T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA), a Novel Radiographic Measure for Global Sagittal Deformity.
    Plachta SM; Israel H; Brechbuhler J; Hayes A; Huebner S; Place HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(21):E1290-E1296. PubMed ID: 29659441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.
    Dimar JR; Carreon LY; Labelle H; Djurasovic M; Weidenbaum M; Brown C; Roussouly P
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1373-9. PubMed ID: 18726124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation and reliability analysis of the new SRS-Schwab classification for adult spinal deformity.
    Liu Y; Liu Z; Zhu F; Qian BP; Zhu Z; Xu L; Ding Y; Qiu Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):902-8. PubMed ID: 23222646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the xipho-pubic angle in patients with sagittal imbalance of the spine.
    Langella F; Villafañe JH; Ismael M; Buric J; Piazzola A; Lamartina C; Berjano P
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2018 Apr; 62(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 26657136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of radiographic parameters comparison between lumbar spine latericumbent and full-length lateral standing radiographs.
    Yang Z; Xie F; Zhang J; Liang Z; Wang Z; Hu X; Luo Z
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1812-1818. PubMed ID: 28694216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment.
    Lafage V; Schwab F; Vira S; Patel A; Ungar B; Farcy JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1037-45. PubMed ID: 21217459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model to accurately predict spinopelvic parameters.
    Harake ES; Linzey JR; Jiang C; Joshi RS; Zaki MM; Jones JC; Khalsa SSS; Lee JH; Wilseck Z; Joseph JR; Hollon TC; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Jul; 41(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 38552236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spine surgeon versus AI algorithm full-length radiographic measurements: a validation study of complex adult spinal deformity patients.
    Haselhuhn JJ; Soriano PBO; Grover P; Dreischarf M; Odland K; Hendrickson NR; Jones KE; Martin CT; Sembrano JN; Polly DW
    Spine Deform; 2024 May; 12(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 38336942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dedicated Spine Measurement Software Quantifies Key Spino-Pelvic Parameters More Reliably Than Traditional Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Tools.
    Gupta M; Henry JK; Schwab F; Klineberg E; Smith JS; Gum J; Polly DW; Liabaud B; Diebo BG; Hamilton DK; Eastlack R; Passias PG; Burton D; Protopsaltis T; Lafage V;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(1):E22-7. PubMed ID: 26571173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracies in Measuring Spinopelvic Parameters in Full-Spine Lateral Standing Radiograph.
    Yamada K; Aota Y; Higashi T; Ishida K; Nimura T; Saito T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):E640-6. PubMed ID: 25816139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.