145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28820288)
1. Cohesive silicone gel implants with smooth, textured or polyurethane-coated surface to restore volume in eviscerated sockets.
Abreu C; Yamashita S; Galindo-Ferreiro A; Modolo M; Pellizzon CH; Padovani CR; Marques MEA; Schellini SA
Orbit; 2018 Feb; 37(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28820288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biocompatibility analysis of bioglass® 45S5 and biosilicate® implants in the rabbit eviscerated socket.
Brandão SM; Schellini SA; Moraes AD; Padovani CR; Pellizzon CH; Peitl O; Zanotto ED
Orbit; 2012 Jun; 31(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 22551363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression positively modulates the characteristics of periprosthetic tissue of polyurethane-coated silicone breast implant in rats.
Vieira VJ; d'Acampora AJ; Marcos ABW; Di Giunta G; de Vasconcellos ZAA; Bins-Ely J; d'Eça Neves R; Figueiredo CP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):1899-1910. PubMed ID: 21124130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic review of the effectiveness of polyurethane-coated compared with textured silicone implants in breast surgery.
Duxbury PJ; Harvey JR
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Apr; 69(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 26887685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The capsule quality of saline-filled smooth silicone, textured silicone, and polyurethane implants in rabbits: a long-term study.
Bucky LP; Ehrlich HP; Sohoni S; May JW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 May; 93(6):1123-31; discussion 1132-3. PubMed ID: 8171130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative study between gelatinous and hard spheres of silicone in rabbit eviscerated scleral cavity].
Kanamura MS; Padovani CR; Pereira EJ; Mamprim MJ; Schellini SA
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2012; 75(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 22872204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants.
Frame J; Kamel D; Olivan M; Cintra H
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 39(5):713-23. PubMed ID: 26304599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of a bacterial contamination on the formation of capsular contracture with polyurethane breast implants in comparison with textured silicone implants: an animal study.
Bergmann PA; Tamouridis G; Lohmeyer JA; Mauss KL; Becker B; Knobloch J; Mailänder P; Siemers F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1364-70. PubMed ID: 24953446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of synthetic hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants in eviscerated rabbit eyes.
Schellini SA; Marques ME; Padovani CR; Taga EM; Rossa R
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 19(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 12644760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Smooth Muscle Alpha Actin Immunoexpression (α-Sma) and CD-117 Antibody (C-Kit) in Capsules Formed by Polyurethane Foam-Coated Silicone Implants and with Textured Surface: A Study on Rats.
Silva EN; Ribas-Filho JM; Tabushi FI; Silva MAP; Siqueira EBD; de Noronha L; da Silva ABD; Lipinski LC; Guth I; Vosgerau LM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 43(1):233-242. PubMed ID: 30276460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Secondary orbital ball implants after enucleation and evisceration: surgical management, morbidity, and long-term outcome.
Quaranta-Leoni FM; Sposato S; Lorenzano D
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015; 31(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 25025388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological evaluation of capsules formed by silicon implants coated with polyurethane foam and with a textured surface in rats.
Silva EN; Ribas-Filho JM; Czeczko NG; Pachnicki JP; Netto MR; Lipinski LC; Noronha L; Colman J; Zeni JO; Carvalho CA
Acta Cir Bras; 2016 Dec; 31(12):774-782. PubMed ID: 28076500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate of vascularization and exposure of silicone-capped porous polyethylene spherical implants: an animal model.
Kalwerisky K; Mihora L; Czyz CN; Foster JA; Holck DE
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 23811596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gelatinous polyethylene in the treatment of the anophthalmic cavity.
Schellini SA; Xavier AP; Hoyama E; Rossa R; Pellizon C; Marques ME; Padovani CR
Orbit; 2002 Sep; 21(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 12187411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porous and nonporous orbital implants for treating the anophthalmic socket: A meta-analysis of case series studies.
Schellini S; Jorge E; Sousa R; Burroughs J; El-Dib R
Orbit; 2016; 35(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 26928263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements.
Shoamanesh A; Pang NK; Oestreicher JH
Orbit; 2007 Sep; 26(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 17891645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of Breast Implant Surfaces, Shapes, and Biomechanics: A Comparison of High Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Textured Silicone, Breast Implants from Three Different Manufacturers.
Atlan M; Bigerelle M; Larreta-garde V; Hindié M; Hedén P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 40(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 26746882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a double-setting alpha-tricalcium phosphate cement in eviscerated rabbit eyes.
Oriá AP; Neto FA; Laus JL; Dos Santos LA; Piza ET; Brunelli AT; Nishimori CT; de Souza AL
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006; 22(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 16550058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty.
Spear SL; Elmaraghy M; Hess C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(4):1542-52; discussion 1553-4. PubMed ID: 10744249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
