These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28821808)

  • 1. Repetition suppression to objects is modulated by stimulus-specific expectations.
    Utzerath C; St John-Saaltink E; Buitelaar J; de Lange FP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8781. PubMed ID: 28821808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FMRI repetition suppression for voices is modulated by stimulus expectations.
    Andics A; Gál V; Vicsi K; Rudas G; Vidnyánszky Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 69():277-83. PubMed ID: 23268783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repetition probability does not affect fMRI repetition suppression for objects.
    Kovács G; Kaiser D; Kaliukhovich DA; Vidnyánszky Z; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(23):9805-12. PubMed ID: 23739977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.
    Summerfield C; Trittschuh EH; Monti JM; Mesulam MM; Egner T
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 11(9):1004-6. PubMed ID: 19160497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal expectations modulate face image repetition suppression of early stimulus evoked event-related potentials.
    Feuerriegel D; Churches O; Coussens S; Keage HAD
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jan; 122():76-87. PubMed ID: 30468778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual Expectations of Object Stimuli Modulate Repetition Suppression in a Delayed Repetition Design.
    Kronbichler L; Said-Yürekli S; Kronbichler M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12526. PubMed ID: 30131582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition probability effects for inverted faces.
    Grotheer M; Hermann P; Vidnyánszky Z; Kovács G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():416-23. PubMed ID: 25123974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category-specific organization of prefrontal response-facilitation during priming.
    Bunzeck N; Schütze H; Düzel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1765-76. PubMed ID: 16701731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adolescents with autism show typical fMRI repetition suppression, but atypical surprise response.
    Utzerath C; Schmits IC; Buitelaar J; de Lange FP
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():25-34. PubMed ID: 30286304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. fMRI evidence of equivalent neural suppression by repetition and prior knowledge.
    Poppenk J; McIntosh AR; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():159-69. PubMed ID: 27461077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prior Expectation Modulates Repetition Suppression without Perceptual Awareness.
    Barbosa LS; Kouider S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5055. PubMed ID: 29568041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of surprise to the prediction based modulation of fMRI responses.
    Amado C; Hermann P; Kovács P; Grotheer M; Vidnyánszky Z; Kovács G
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():105-12. PubMed ID: 26873275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impossible expectations: fMRI adaptation in the lateral occipital complex (LOC) is modulated by the statistical regularities of 3D structural information.
    Freud E; Ganel T; Avidan G
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():188-94. PubMed ID: 26254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex.
    Kok P; Failing MF; de Lange FP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1546-54. PubMed ID: 24392894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repetition probability effects depend on prior experiences.
    Grotheer M; Kovács G
    J Neurosci; 2014 May; 34(19):6640-6. PubMed ID: 24806689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural repetition suppression: evidence for perceptual expectation in object-selective regions.
    Mayrhauser L; Bergmann J; Crone J; Kronbichler M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():225. PubMed ID: 24860461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition suppression and effects of familiarity on blood oxygenation level dependent signal and gamma-band activity.
    Friese U; Rahm B; Hassler U; Kaiser J; Gruber T
    Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):757-61. PubMed ID: 22850486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces.
    Kovács G; Iffland L; Vidnyánszky Z; Greenlee MW
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 22387172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for spatiotemporally distinct effects of image repetition and perceptual expectations as measured by event-related potentials.
    Feuerriegel D; Churches O; Coussens S; Keage HAD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():94-105. PubMed ID: 29247805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.