BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28821890)

  • 1. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
    Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
    Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
    Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
    Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined use of cytology, p16 immunostaining and genotyping for triage of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus at primary screening.
    Cuzick J; Adcock R; Carozzi F; Gillio-Tos A; De Marco L; Del Mistro A; Frayle H; Girlando S; Sani C; Confortini M; Zorzi M; Giorgi-Rossi P; Rizzolo R; Ronco G;
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Oct; 147(7):1864-1873. PubMed ID: 32170961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of BMRT-HPV for cervical cancer screening].
    Duan LF; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Qu XF; Duan XZ; Liu Y; Shi B; Zhang W; Wei LH; Belinson L; Wu RF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):708-715. PubMed ID: 33120484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
    Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical value of p16
    Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
    Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
    Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
    Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PCR-reverse dot blot human papillomavirus genotyping as a primary screening test for cervical cancer in a hospital-based cohort.
    Kang Y; Sun P; Mao X; Dong B; Ruan G; Chen L
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e29. PubMed ID: 30887754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation and budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening using cobas 4800 HPV screening technology in the public sector of South Africa.
    Dreyer G; Maske C; Stander M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221495. PubMed ID: 31509545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary screening for cervical cancer based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotyping, in comparison to cytology.
    Agorastos T; Chatzistamatiou K; Katsamagkas T; Koliopoulos G; Daponte A; Constantinidis T; Constantinidis TC;
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119755. PubMed ID: 25793281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women.
    Wu Q; Zhao X; Fu Y; Wang X; Zhang X; Tian X; Cheng B; Lu B; Yu X; Lan S; Lu W; Ma D; Cheng X; Xie X
    Cancer Med; 2017 May; 6(5):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 28378404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women.
    Zhao X; Wu Q; Wang X; Fu Y; Zhang X; Tian X; Cheng B; Lu B; Yu X; Lan S; Lu W; Ma D; Cheng X; Xie X
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1322-1327. PubMed ID: 29518562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of CIN2+ /CIN3+ risk of different HPV subtypes infection combined with abnormal cytology status].
    Luo HX; Du H; Liu ZH; Zhang LJ; Wang C; Wu RF
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 40(3):232-238. PubMed ID: 29575846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 83.