These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28822140)

  • 1. Optical fiber Bragg grating-instrumented silicone liner for interface pressure measurement within prosthetic sockets of lower-limb amputees.
    Al-Fakih E; Arifin N; Pirouzi G; Mahamd Adikan FR; Shasmin HN; Abu Osman NA
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Aug; 22(8):1-8. PubMed ID: 28822140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
    Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The capability of fiber Bragg grating sensors to measure amputees' trans-tibial stump/socket interface pressures.
    Al-Fakih EA; Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Adikan FR
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Aug; 13(8):10348-57. PubMed ID: 23941909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pressure and shear sensing liner for prosthetic sockets.
    Wheeler J; Mazumdar A; Marron L; Dullea K; Sanders J; Allyn K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2026-2029. PubMed ID: 28268728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method to quantify liner deformation within a prosthetic socket for below knee amputees.
    Lenz AL; Johnson KA; Bush TR
    J Biomech; 2018 Jun; 74():213-219. PubMed ID: 29678418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
    Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.
    Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Razak NA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 24315710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.
    McGrath MP; Gao J; Tang J; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader D; Moser D; Zahedi S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Mar; 231(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 28164748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosthetic liners for lower limb amputees: a review of the literature.
    Klute GK; Glaister BC; Berge JS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 20384553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin Temperature Prediction in Lower Limb Prostheses.
    Mathur N; Glesk I; Buis A
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Jan; 20(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 25389248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of liner design and materials selection on prosthesis interface heat dissipation.
    Williams RJ; Washington ED; Miodownik M; Holloway C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):275-279. PubMed ID: 28905679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket.
    Boutwell E; Stine R; Hansen A; Tucker K; Gard S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 22773525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
    Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design.
    Ko ST; Asplund F; Zeybek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between socket pressure and EMG of two muscles in trans-femoral stumps during gait.
    Hong JH; Mun MS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16180378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a prosthetic suspension system: Looped silicone liner.
    Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Eshraghi A; Wan Abas WAB
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 28946824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hygiene problems of residual limb and silicone liners in transtibial amputees wearing the total surface bearing socket.
    Hachisuka K; Nakamura T; Ohmine S; Shitama H; Shinkoda K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Sep; 82(9):1286-90. PubMed ID: 11552206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.