These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28822140)

  • 21. Study on friction behavior at the interface between prosthetic socket and liner.
    Xie J; Liu X; Tang J; Li XI; Li W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2021; 23(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 34846045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets.
    Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Brzostowski JT; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Oct; 84():75-83. PubMed ID: 32977925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Design of lower limb prosthetic sockets: a review.
    Wang M; Nong Q; Liu Y; Yu H
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 34932435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Piezoelectric bimorphs' characteristics as in-socket sensors for transfemoral amputees.
    El-Sayed AM; Hamzaid NA; Abu Osman NA
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Dec; 14(12):23724-41. PubMed ID: 25513823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sustainable, affordable and functional: reimagining prosthetic liners in resource limited environments.
    Miyata Y; Sasaki K; Guerra G; Rattanakoch J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(12):2941-2947. PubMed ID: 33167733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An experimental study of the interface pressure profile during level walking of a new suspension system for lower limb amputees.
    Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23157843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: Literature review and professional feedback.
    Gholizadeh H; Lemaire ED; Eshraghi A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Aug; 37():108-116. PubMed ID: 27423025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A personalised prosthetic liner with embedded sensor technology: a case study.
    Paternò L; Dhokia V; Menciassi A; Bilzon J; Seminati E
    Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Sep; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 32928238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A pneumatic reconfigurable socket for transtibial amputees.
    Mollaee S; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC; Budgett DM; Taberner AJ; Nielsen PMF
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Feb; 40(2):e3801. PubMed ID: 38185908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Practical Approach for Evaluation of Socket Pistoning for Lower Limb Amputees.
    Vempala V; Liu M; Kamper D; Huang H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():3938-3941. PubMed ID: 30441222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Silicone soft socket system for the treatment of geriatric transtibial amputees.
    Breuer R; Trieb K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2021 Mar; 133(5-6):216-221. PubMed ID: 32300882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation on effects of amputee's physiological parameters on maximum pressure developed at the prosthetic socket interface using artificial neural network.
    Nayak C; Singh A; Chaudhary H; Unune DR
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Oct; 25(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 28854522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetic resonance imaging technology in transtibial socket research: a pilot study.
    Buis AW; Condon B; Brennan D; McHugh B; Hadley D
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 17436174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The functional, spatio-temporal and satisfaction outcomes of transtibial amputees with a hydrocast socket following an extended usage period in an under-resourced environment.
    Laing S; Lee PVS; Lavranos J; Lythgo N
    Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():88-93. PubMed ID: 30170139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
    Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of the scale reduction in designing sockets for trans-tibial amputees.
    Dakhil N; Tarrade T; Behr M; Mo F; Evin M; Thefenne L; Liu T; Llari M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Aug; 234(8):761-768. PubMed ID: 32475295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finite element analysis of the contact interface between trans-femoral stump and prosthetic socket.
    Zhang L; Zhu M; Shen L; Zheng F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1270-3. PubMed ID: 24109926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
    Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials for prosthetic liners.
    Devin KM; Tang J; Hamilton AR; Moser D; Jiang L
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Mar; 238(3):348-357. PubMed ID: 38279687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Residual-limb skin temperature in transtibial sockets.
    Peery JT; Ledoux WR; Klute GK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 15944879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.