These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28822594)
21. Standardized wording to improve efficiency and clarity of GRADE EtD frameworks in health guidelines. Piggott T; Baldeh T; Dietl B; Wiercoch W; Nieuwlaat R; Santesso N; Coello PA; Schünemann HJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jun; 146():106-122. PubMed ID: 35041970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations. Lewin S; Glenton C; Lawrie TA; Downe S; Finlayson KW; Rosenbaum S; Barreix M; Tunçalp Ö Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Aug; 17(1):75. PubMed ID: 31391119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Development Scheme: An Overview of Evidence Quality Assessment Methods, Evidence to Decision Frameworks, and Reporting Standards in Guideline Development. Antoniou GA; Bastos Gonçalves F; Björck M; Chakfé N; Coscas R; Dias NV; Dick F; Kakkos SK; Mees BME; Resch T; Trimarchi S; Tulamo R; Twine CP; Vermassen F; Wanhainen A; Kolh P Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2022 Jun; 63(6):791-799. PubMed ID: 35697645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using evidence to decision frameworks led to guidelines of better quality and more credible and transparent recommendations. Meneses-Echavez JF; Bidonde J; Montesinos-Guevara C; Amer YS; Loaiza-Betancur AF; Tellez Tinjaca LA; Fraile Navarro D; Poklepović Peričić T; Tokalić R; Bala MM; Storman D; Swierz M; Zając J; Flórez ID; Schünemann H; Flottorp S; Alonso-Coello P J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 162():38-46. PubMed ID: 37517506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Decisions to Start, Strengthen, and Sustain Food Fortification Programs: An Application of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) Framework in Nigeria. Friesen VM; Mbuya MNN; Wieringa FT; Nelson CN; Ojo M; Neufeld LM Curr Dev Nutr; 2022 Mar; 6(3):nzac010. PubMed ID: 35261958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations. Li SA; Alexander PE; Reljic T; Cuker A; Nieuwlaat R; Wiercioch W; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():103-112. PubMed ID: 30253221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ; Moberg J; Brignardello-Petersen R; Akl EA; Davoli M; Treweek S; Mustafa RA; Rada G; Rosenbaum S; Morelli A; Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i2016. PubMed ID: 27353417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Investigating how the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework is used in Clinical Guidelines: a scoping review protocol. Murray R; Sharp M; Razidan A; Hibbitts B; Ryan M; Mahtani K; Lynch R; Smith S; O'Neill M; Schünemann H; Alonso-Coello P; Munn Z; Clyne B HRB Open Res; 2023; 6():50. PubMed ID: 38779426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. Alonso-Coello P; Oxman AD; Moberg J; Brignardello-Petersen R; Akl EA; Davoli M; Treweek S; Mustafa RA; Vandvik PO; Meerpohl J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i2089. PubMed ID: 27365494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Guidelines that use the GRADE approach often fail to provide complete economic information for recommendations: A systematic survey. Riva JJ; Bhatt M; Brunarski DJ; Busse JW; Martins CC; Xie F; Schünemann HJ; Brozek JL J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():203-215. PubMed ID: 33984495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of Simulation Modeling to Inform Decision Making for Health Care Systems and Policy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Smith H; Varshoei P; Boushey R; Kuziemsky C JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 May; 9(5):e16103. PubMed ID: 32401223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The GRADE approach, Part 2: Evidence to decision frameworksoutlining decision-making in health. Quilodrán C; Kirmayr M; Valente B; Pérez-Bracchiglione J; Garegnani L; Franco JVA Medwave; 2021 May; 21(4):e8182. PubMed ID: 34086664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system]. Schünemann H Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Indirectness (transferability) is critical when considering existing economic evaluations for GRADE clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Riva JJ; Bhatt M; Martins CC; Brunarski DJ; Busse JW; Xie F; Schünemann HJ; Brozek JL J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 148():81-92. PubMed ID: 35462047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach. Zhang Y; Coello PA; Brożek J; Wiercioch W; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Akl EA; Meerpohl JJ; Alhazzani W; Carrasco-Labra A; Morgan RL; Mustafa RA; Riva JJ; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello-Garcia C; AlRayees Z; Manja V; Falavigna M; Neumann I; Brignardello-Petersen R; Santesso N; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Adi Y; Bollig C; Waziry R; Schünemann HJ Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 May; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 28460638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Users' experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis. Meneses-Echavez JF; Rosenbaum S; Rada G; Flottorp S; Moberg J; Alonso-Coello P BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34034723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Decision-making frameworks and considerations for informing coverage decisions for healthcare interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis. Morgan RL; Kelley L; Guyatt GH; Johnson A; Lavis JN J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():143-150. PubMed ID: 28988959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]