These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28822982)

  • 1. Evaluation of aortic regurgitation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.
    Lee JC; Branch KR; Hamilton-Craig C; Krieger EV
    Heart; 2018 Jan; 104(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 28822982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Evaluate Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Ribeiro HB; Orwat S; Hayek SS; Larose É; Babaliaros V; Dahou A; Le Ven F; Pasian S; Puri R; Abdul-Jawad Altisent O; Campelo-Parada F; Clavel MA; Pibarot P; Lerakis S; Baumgartner H; Rodés-Cabau J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(6):577-585. PubMed ID: 27491900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of CMR in quantification of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI.
    Salaun E; Jacquier A; Theron A; Giorgi R; Lambert M; Jaussaud N; Hubert S; Collart F; Bonnet JL; Habib G; Cuisset T; Grisoli D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26188194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Ribeiro HB; Le Ven F; Larose E; Dahou A; Nombela-Franco L; Urena M; Allende R; Amat-Santos I; Ricapito Mde L; Thébault C; Clavel MA; Delarochelliére R; Doyle D; Dumont E; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
    Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1924-32. PubMed ID: 25124218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation with dual-source CT: Comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Ko SM; Park JH; Shin JK; Kim JS
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 26088382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Non-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Computed Tomography Angiography for Aortic Annular Sizing Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Wang J; Jagasia DH; Kondapally YR; Herrmann HC; Han Y
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 29(7):239-245. PubMed ID: 28570260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-Analysis of Transthoracic Echocardiography Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
    Papanastasiou CA; Kokkinidis DG; Jonnalagadda AK; Oikonomou EK; Kampaktsis PN; Garcia MJ; Myerson SG; Karamitsos TD
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 124(8):1246-1251. PubMed ID: 31466694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of Aortic Valve Regurgitation by Pulsed Doppler Examination of the Left Subclavian Artery Velocity Contour: A Validation Study with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Hilbert S; Busch F; Schloma V; Dmitrieva Y; Bonamigo Thome F; Löbe S; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Mohr FW; Borger MA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Jan; 31(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 29191732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: aortic root angiography in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Frick M; Meyer CG; Kirschfink A; Altiok E; Lehrke M; Brehmer K; Lotfi S; Hoffmann R
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Mar; 11(12):1419-27. PubMed ID: 25772902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Cawley PJ; Hamilton-Craig C; Owens DS; Krieger EV; Strugnell WE; Mitsumori L; D'Jang CL; Schwaegler RG; Nguyen KQ; Nguyen B; Maki JH; Otto CM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic regurgitation severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is underestimated by echocardiography compared with MRI.
    Orwat S; Diller GP; Kaleschke G; Kerckhoff G; Kempny A; Radke RM; Buerke B; Burg M; Schülke C; Baumgartner H
    Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1933-8. PubMed ID: 25060755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided aortic valve replacement using Engager valve.
    Kindzelski BA; Li M; Mazilu D; Hunt T; Horvath KA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 98(6):2194-9. PubMed ID: 25468087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Regurgitation.
    Kammerlander AA; Wiesinger M; Duca F; Aschauer S; Binder C; Zotter Tufaro C; Nitsche C; Badre-Eslam R; Schönbauer R; Bartko P; Beitzke D; Loewe C; Hengstenberg C; Bonderman D; Mascherbauer J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1474-1483. PubMed ID: 30448117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cardiac valvular regurgitant lesions by cardiac MRI sequences: comparison of a four-valve semi-quantitative versus quantitative approach.
    Reddy ST; Shah M; Doyle M; Thompson DV; Williams RB; Yamrozik J; Biederman RW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jul; 22(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 24224411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography.
    Chelu RG; van den Bosch AE; van Kranenburg M; Hsiao A; van den Hoven AT; Ouhlous M; Budde RPJ; Beniest KM; Swart LE; Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Wielopolski PA; Vasanawala SS; Roos-Hesselink JW; Nieman K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 32(2):301-307. PubMed ID: 26498478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
    Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.