302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28823473)
1. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers.
Foulis SA; Sharp MA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Gebhardt DL; Baker TA; Canino MC; Zambraski EJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S74-S78. PubMed ID: 28823473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twelve weeks of concurrent resistance and interval training improves military occupational task performance in men and women.
Sterczala AJ; Krajewski KT; Peterson PA; Sekel NM; Lovalekar M; Wardle SL; O'Leary TJ; Greeves JP; Flanagan SD; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Dec; 23(12):2411-2424. PubMed ID: 37517090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Differences in Physical Fitness and Occupational Task Performance Between Trainees and Active Duty Soldiers.
Canino MC; Foulis SA; Zambraski EJ; Cohen BS; Redmond JE; Hauret KG; Frykman PN; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 29952870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the Army Physical Fitness Test and the Occupational Physical Assessment Test in Reserve Officer Training Corps Cadets: A Brief Report.
Draicchio C; Martin JR; Fyock-Martin MB; Merrigan JJ
Mil Med; 2020 Aug; 185(7-8):e937-e943. PubMed ID: 32463096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association Between Performance in Muscle Fitness Field Tests and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Soldiers.
Aandstad A
Mil Med; 2020 Jun; 185(5-6):e839-e846. PubMed ID: 31875898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.
Allison KF; Keenan KA; Wohleber MF; Perlsweig KA; Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Beals K; Coleman LC; Nindl BC
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S85-S90. PubMed ID: 28899656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical Fitness Predictors of a Warrior Task Simulation Test.
Huang HC; Nagai T; Lovalekar M; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Sep; 32(9):2562-2568. PubMed ID: 30137030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. Army physical demands study: Accuracy of occupational physical assessment test classifications for combat arms soldiers.
Foulis SA; Canino MC; Cohen BS; Gebhardt DL; Redmond JE; Sharp MA
Work; 2019; 63(4):571-579. PubMed ID: 31282460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical employment standards for U.K. fire and rescue service personnel.
Blacker SD; Rayson MP; Wilkinson DM; Carter JM; Nevill AM; Richmond VL
Occup Med (Lond); 2016 Jan; 66(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 26428442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex and age differences in physical performance: A comparison of Army basic training and operational populations.
Dada EO; Anderson MK; Grier T; Alemany JA; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S68-S73. PubMed ID: 29100826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generic task-related occupational requirements for Royal Naval personnel.
Bilzon JL; Scarpello EG; Bilzon E; Allsopp AJ
Occup Med (Lond); 2002 Dec; 52(8):503-10. PubMed ID: 12488523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Box Lift and Place Assessment is Related to Performance of Several Military Manual Handling Tasks.
Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Savage RJ; Best SA; Beck B; Doyle TL
Mil Med; 2016 Mar; 181(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 26926751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Swiss Army physical fitness test battery predicts risk of overuse injuries among recruits.
Wyss T; Von Vigier RO; Frey F; Mäder U
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2012 Oct; 52(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 22976738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Army Physical Fitness Test scores predict coronary heart disease risk in Army National Guard soldiers.
Talbot LA; Weinstein AA; Fleg JL
Mil Med; 2009 Mar; 174(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 19354087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Associations of Physical Fitness and Body Composition Characteristics With Simulated Military Task Performance.
Pihlainen K; Santtila M; Häkkinen K; Kyröläinen H
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 28549046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. History of United States Army physical fitness and physical readiness training.
Knapik JJ; East WB
US Army Med Dep J; 2014; ():5-19. PubMed ID: 24706237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Reliability of Simulations of Physically Demanding Tasks Performed by Combat Arms Soldiers.
Foulis SA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Zambraski EJ; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Dec; 31(12):3245-3252. PubMed ID: 28368954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
