These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28823632)

  • 1. Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses.
    Song X; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():33-39. PubMed ID: 28823632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The laterality of stop and go processes of the motor response in left-handed and right-handed individuals.
    Hiraoka K; Igawa K; Kashiwagi M; Nakahara C; Oshima Y; Takakura Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jan; 23(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 28378624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coding valence in touchscreen interactions: hand dominance and lateral movement influence valence appraisals of emotional pictures.
    Cervera Torres S; Ruiz Fernández S; Lachmair M; Gerjets P
    Psychol Res; 2020 Feb; 84(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29330594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Valence-space compatibility effects depend on situated motor fluency in both right- and left-handers.
    Milhau A; Brouillet T; Brouillet D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):887-99. PubMed ID: 25379954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Mental Timeline in a Crossed-Hands Paradigm.
    de la Vega I; Eikmeier V; Ulrich R; Kaup B
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Nov; 63(6):326-332. PubMed ID: 28059026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of acute experimental hand pain on left-right discrimination response latency for hand recognition.
    Phillips N; Hach S; Mannion J; Moran R
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2020 Nov; 36(11):1232-1240. PubMed ID: 30724639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One hand or the other? Effector selection biases in right and left handers.
    Main JC; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():300-9. PubMed ID: 25278131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of handedness on tactile temporal order judgment.
    Wada M; Yamamoto S; Kitazawa S
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(14):1887-95. PubMed ID: 15381018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keep your hands crossed: the valence-by-left/right interaction is related to hand, not side, in an incongruent hand-response key assignment.
    de la Vega I; Dudschig C; De Filippis M; Lachmair M; Kaup B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 23376138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differing roles for the dominant and non-dominant hands in the hand laterality task.
    Ní Choisdealbha Á; Brady N; Maguinness C
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 May; 211(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 21533699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional plasticity of sensorimotor representations following short-term immobilization of the dominant versus non-dominant hands.
    Meugnot A; Toussaint L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():51-6. PubMed ID: 25553344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric transfer in reaching programming.
    Velay JL; Benoit-Dubrocard S
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jul; 37(8):895-903. PubMed ID: 10426515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: presentation of stimuli within one visual hemifield].
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 7448039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect.
    Seibold JC; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):437-51. PubMed ID: 26676871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.