415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28825182)
1. Serious Choices: A Protocol for an Environmental Scan of Patient Decision Aids for Seriously Ill People at Risk of Death Facing Choices about Life-Sustaining Treatments.
Saunders CH; Elwyn G; Kirkland K; Durand MA
Patient; 2018 Feb; 11(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 28825182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serious Choices: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Decision Aids and Their Use for Seriously Ill People Near Death.
Saunders CH; Patel K; Kang H; Elwyn G; Kirkland K; Durand MA
J Hosp Med; 2019 May; 14(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 30794146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids.
Donnelly KZ; Thompson R
BMJ Open; 2015 Jul; 5(7):e007966. PubMed ID: 26173718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "There were more decisions and more options than just yes or no": Evaluating a decision aid for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.
Bakitas M; Dionne-Odom JN; Jackson L; Frost J; Bishop MF; Li Z
Palliat Support Care; 2017 Feb; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27516060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: A Systematic Review.
Austin CA; Mohottige D; Sudore RL; Smith AK; Hanson LC
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Jul; 175(7):1213-21. PubMed ID: 25985438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intuitive vs Deliberative Approaches to Making Decisions About Life Support: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Rubin EB; Buehler AE; Cooney E; Gabler NB; Mante AA; Halpern SD
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jan; 2(1):e187851. PubMed ID: 30681717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.
Witteman HO; Dansokho SC; Colquhoun H; Coulter A; Dugas M; Fagerlin A; Giguere AM; Glouberman S; Haslett L; Hoffman A; Ivers N; Légaré F; Légaré J; Levin C; Lopez K; Montori VM; Provencher T; Renaud JS; Sparling K; Stacey D; Vaisson G; Volk RJ; Witteman W
Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):11. PubMed ID: 25623074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Video decision aids to assist with advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jain A; Corriveau S; Quinn K; Gardhouse A; Vegas DB; You JJ
BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007491. PubMed ID: 26109115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study.
Kryworuchko J; Strachan PH; Nouvet E; Downar J; You JJ
BMJ Open; 2016 May; 6(5):e010451. PubMed ID: 27217281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring patient treatment preferences in end-of-life care research: applications for advance care planning interventions and response shift research.
Schwartz CE; Merriman MP; Reed GW; Hammes BJ
J Palliat Med; 2004 Apr; 7(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 15130201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making.
Sharma RK; Hughes MT; Nolan MT; Tudor C; Kub J; Terry PB; Sulmasy DP
J Gen Intern Med; 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6. PubMed ID: 21499822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Promoting or Undermining Quality Decision Making? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Patient Decision Aids Comparing Surgical and Medication Abortion.
Donnelly KZ; Elwyn G; Theiler R; Thompson R
Womens Health Issues; 2019; 29(5):414-423. PubMed ID: 31266679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Health Care Systems Approach to Improving Care for Seriously Ill Patients.
Lehmann LS; Lowery J; Sharpe VA; Berkowitz KA
Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2020; 10(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33416550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Reder M; Kolip P
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26198675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.
Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Covinsky KE; Wu AW; Galanos A; Desbiens NA; Phillips RS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S176-82. PubMed ID: 10809472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making: perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients and family members.
Heyland DK; Frank C; Groll D; Pichora D; Dodek P; Rocker G; Gafni A
Chest; 2006 Aug; 130(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 16899840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do published patient decision aids for end-of-life care address patients' decision-making needs? A systematic review and critical appraisal.
Phillips G; Lifford K; Edwards A; Poolman M; Joseph-Williams N
Palliat Med; 2019 Sep; 33(8):985-1002. PubMed ID: 31199197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the Decisional Conflict Scale for measuring the quality of end-of-life decision making.
Song MK; Sereika SM
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 15970420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
