These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Onlay with Adhesive Use Compared with Sublay Mesh Placement in Ventral Hernia Repair: Was Chevrel Right? An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. Haskins IN; Voeller GR; Stoikes NF; Webb DL; Chandler RG; Phillips S; Poulose BK; Rosen MJ J Am Coll Surg; 2017 May; 224(5):962-970. PubMed ID: 28161483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Majumder A; Winder JS; Wen Y; Pauli EM; Belyansky I; Novitsky YW Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):828-838. PubMed ID: 27452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes of heavyweight versus mediumweight synthetic mesh in a retrospective cohort of clean-contaminated and contaminated retromuscular ventral hernia repairs. Ellis RC; Maskal SM; Messer N; Miller BT; Petro CC; Prabhu AS; Rosen MJ; Zheng X; Beffa LRA Surg Endosc; 2024 Jul; 38(7):4006-4013. PubMed ID: 38862822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias. Liang MK; Berger RL; Li LT; Davila JA; Hicks SC; Kao LS JAMA Surg; 2013 Nov; 148(11):1043-8. PubMed ID: 24005537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study. Rosen MJ; Bauer JJ; Harmaty M; Carbonell AM; Cobb WS; Matthews B; Goldblatt MI; Selzer DJ; Poulose BK; Hansson BM; Rosman C; Chao JJ; Jacobsen GR Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):205-211. PubMed ID: 28009747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Component Separation Technique with Synthetic Mesh. Slater NJ; Knaapen L; Bökkerink WJV; Biemans MJA; Buyne OR; Ulrich DJO; Bleichrodt RP; van Goor H Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Dec; 136(6):796e-805e. PubMed ID: 26595034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliable complex abdominal wall hernia repairs with a narrow, well-fixed retrorectus polypropylene mesh: A review of over 100 consecutive cases. Lanier ST; Fligor JE; Miller KR; Dumanian GA Surgery; 2016 Dec; 160(6):1508-1516. PubMed ID: 27545993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of a new slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh (Phasix™) in potentially contaminated incisional hernias: A prospective, multi-center, single-arm trial. van Rooijen MM; Jairam AP; Tollens T; Jørgensen LN; de Vries Reilingh TS; Piessen G; Köckerling F; Miserez M; Windsor AC; Berrevoet F; Fortelny RH; Dousset B; Woeste G; van Westreenen HL; Gossetti F; Lange JF; Tetteroo GW; Koch A; Kroese LF; Jeekel J Int J Surg; 2020 Nov; 83():31-36. PubMed ID: 32931978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of light and midweight synthetic mesh use in clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral incisional hernia repair: an ACHQC comparative analysis. Polcz ME; Pierce RA; Olson MA; Blankush J; Duke MC; Broucek J; Bradley JF Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5583-5590. PubMed ID: 36319897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of polypropylene mesh in contaminated and dirty strangulated hernias: short-term results. Pandey H; Thakur DS; Somashekar U; Kothari R; Agarwal P; Sharma D Hernia; 2018 Dec; 22(6):1045-1050. PubMed ID: 30145621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence. Romain B; Story F; Meyer N; Delhorme JB; Brigand C; Rohr S J Wound Care; 2016 Jun; 25(6):320-5. PubMed ID: 27286664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases. Choi JJ; Palaniappa NC; Dallas KB; Rudich TB; Colon MJ; Divino CM Ann Surg; 2012 Jan; 255(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 21677561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair. Sbitany H; Kwon E; Chern H; Finlayson E; Varma MG; Hansen SL Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 24317239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns of Recurrence and Mechanisms of Failure after Open Ventral Hernia Repair with Mesh. Warren JA; McGrath SP; Hale AL; Ewing JA; Carbonell AM; Cobb WS Am Surg; 2017 Nov; 83(11):1275-1282. PubMed ID: 29183531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observational Cohort Study on the Use of a Slowly Fully Resorbable Synthetic Mesh (Phasix™) in the Treatment of Complex Abdominal Wall Pathology with Different Grades of Contamination. van Driel LJ; Miserez M; Aarts F; Tollens T Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():186-192. PubMed ID: 33823056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair. Koscielny A; Widenmayer S; May T; Kalff J; Lingohr P Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Mar; 403(2):255-263. PubMed ID: 29214543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of biosynthetic versus synthetic mesh in clean and contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Keogh K; Slater K ANZ J Surg; 2020 Apr; 90(4):542-546. PubMed ID: 31837115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]