These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28826821)

  • 1. Peer (and brothers) review? Ethical challenges in author-proposed peer-reviewers.
    Charlier P; Al-Chaer ED; Bou Abdallah F; Massaad C; Hervé C
    Eur J Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 47():e24-e25. PubMed ID: 28826821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
    Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer Reviewers and Quality.
    Davidson HE
    Consult Pharm; 2015 Jan; 30(1):1. PubMed ID: 27424332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?
    García-Doval I
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012].
    Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J
    Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jul; 141(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 24356739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Where have all the reviewers gone?
    Ellaway RH
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):717-720. PubMed ID: 38864958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing ethical and peer review standards of medical journals.
    Dickens B;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 26972183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency.
    Parker TH; Griffith SC; Bronstein JL; Fidler F; Foster S; Fraser H; Forstmeier W; Gurevitch J; Koricheva J; Seppelt R; Tingley MW; Nakagawa S
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Jun; 2(6):929-935. PubMed ID: 29789547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Our senior editorial reviewers: a centerpiece.
    Implant Dent; 2015 Jun; 24(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 26011729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review policies in medical student journals.
    Al-Busaidi IS; Alamri Y
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Jun; 94(1112):362-363. PubMed ID: 29463683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer Review Week 2022: an interview with Franziska Denk and Katryn Stacey about their views on research integrity as scientists and reviewers.
    Commun Biol; 2022 Sep; 5(1):971. PubMed ID: 36127388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process.
    Hak DJ; Giannoudis P; Mauffrey C
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 26724808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. JA&WMA dedicates this issue to its exceptional reviewers and editors.
    Rao ST
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jan; 66(1):1. PubMed ID: 26720771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New authors' guidelines for Palliative Medicine: more work for authors, reviewers and editors or an essential tool?
    Walshe C
    Palliat Med; 2010 Sep; 24(6):559-60. PubMed ID: 20837732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authors' financial interests should be made known to manuscript reviewers.
    de Melo-Martín I; Intemann K
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7150):129. PubMed ID: 17625543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review - An editor's perspective.
    Bennett RC
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2019 May; 46(3):257-259. PubMed ID: 31072613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AJIC's peer review process: striving for ever-increasing excellence.
    Bunner C; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 Feb; 41(2):96. PubMed ID: 23369313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.