BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28827129)

  • 21. Reversal of TMS-induced motor twitch by training is associated with a reduction in excitability of the antagonist muscle.
    Giacobbe V; Volpe BT; Thickbroom GW; Fregni F; Pascual-Leone A; Krebs HI; Edwards DJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 8():46. PubMed ID: 21861922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differentiation of motor evoked potentials elicited from multiple forearm muscles: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography.
    Neva JL; Gallina A; Peters S; Garland SJ; Boyd LA
    Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():91-99. PubMed ID: 28935187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.
    Stinear CM; Byblow WD
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 14997259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cortical excitability and motor task in man: an investigation of the wrist extensor motor area.
    Aimonetti JM; Nielsen JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 11914788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with motor imagery on the corticospinal excitability of antagonist muscles.
    Asao A; Hoshino Y; Nomura T; Shibuya K
    Neuroreport; 2021 Jul; 32(10):894-898. PubMed ID: 34029290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combined effect of motor imagery and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on the motor cortex.
    Saito K; Yamaguchi T; Yoshida N; Tanabe S; Kondo K; Sugawara K
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 227(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23591692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction.
    Kaneko F; Hayami T; Aoyama T; Kizuka T
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():94. PubMed ID: 24902891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence That Brain-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Could Elicit Targeted Corticospinal Facilitation of Hand Muscles in Healthy Young Adults.
    Suzuki Y; Jovanovic LI; Fadli RA; Yamanouchi Y; Marquez-Chin C; Popovic MR; Nomura T; Milosevic M
    Neuromodulation; 2023 Dec; 26(8):1612-1621. PubMed ID: 35088740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Task-dependent changes of corticospinal excitability during observation and motor imagery of balance tasks.
    Mouthon A; Ruffieux J; Wälchli M; Keller M; Taube W
    Neuroscience; 2015 Sep; 303():535-43. PubMed ID: 26192097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of electrical stimulation of antagonist muscles for voluntary motor drive.
    Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Higashi T
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2019 Jun; 36(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 31092131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.
    Hashimoto R; Rothwell JC
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Mar; 125(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 10100979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scaling of motor cortical excitability during unimanual force generation.
    Perez MA; Cohen LG
    Cortex; 2009 Oct; 45(9):1065-71. PubMed ID: 19243741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modification of motor cortex excitability during muscle relaxation in motor learning.
    Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Saitoh K; Higashi T
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 296():78-84. PubMed ID: 26341320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of imagined posture and imagery modality on corticospinal excitability.
    Fourkas AD; Ionta S; Aglioti SM
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 168(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 16313979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Different motor learning effects on excitability changes of motor cortex in muscle contraction state.
    Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Higashi T
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Sep; 30(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 23560694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of simultaneous contractions of ipsilateral muscles on changes in corticospinal excitability induced by paired associative stimulation (PAS).
    Kennedy NC; Carson RG
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 445(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 18771706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. No graded responses of finger muscles to TMS during motor imagery of isometric finger forces.
    Park WH; Li S
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 494(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 21406217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Motor imagery of phasic thumb abduction temporally and spatially modulates corticospinal excitability.
    Stinear CM; Byblow WD
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 May; 114(5):909-14. PubMed ID: 12738438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor cortex excitability upon release of tonic muscle contraction.
    Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Higashi T
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2016; 33(3-4):161-168. PubMed ID: 27666529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time course changes in corticospinal excitability during repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with motor imagery.
    Asao A; Wada K; Nomura T; Shibuya K
    Neurosci Lett; 2022 Feb; 771():136427. PubMed ID: 34971770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.