170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28827254)
1. Distinguishing variation in referral accuracy from referral threshold: analysis of a national dataset of referrals for suspected cancer.
Burton CD; McLernon DJ; Lee AJ; Murchie P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016439. PubMed ID: 28827254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contribution of primary care organisation and specialist care provider to variation in GP referrals for suspected cancer: ecological analysis of national data.
Burton C; O'Neill L; Oliver P; Murchie P
BMJ Qual Saf; 2020 Apr; 29(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 31586938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation and statistical reliability of publicly reported primary care diagnostic activity indicators for cancer: a cross-sectional ecological study of routine data.
Abel G; Saunders CL; Mendonca SC; Gildea C; McPhail S; Lyratzopoulos G
BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Jan; 27(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 28847789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations between general practice characteristics with use of urgent referrals for suspected cancer and endoscopies: a cross-sectional ecological study.
Mendonca SC; Abel GA; Gildea C; McPhail S; Peake MD; Rubin G; Singh H; Hamilton W; Walter FM; Roland MO; Lyratzopoulos G
Fam Pract; 2019 Oct; 36(5):573-580. PubMed ID: 30541076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associations between diagnostic activity and measures of patient experience in primary care: a cross-sectional ecological study of English general practices.
Lyratzopoulos G; Mendonca SC; Gildea C; McPhail S; Peake MD; Rubin G; Singh H; Hamilton W; Walter FM; Roland M; Abel GA
Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Jan; 68(666):e9-e17. PubMed ID: 29255108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing variation in general practitioner referral rates through clinical engagement and peer review of referrals: a service improvement project.
Evans E; Aiking H; Edwards A
Qual Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 21902906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation in use of the 2-week referral pathway for suspected cancer: a cross-sectional analysis.
Meechan D; Gildea C; Hollingworth L; Richards MA; Riley D; Rubin G
Br J Gen Pract; 2012 Sep; 62(602):e590-7. PubMed ID: 22947579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do general practices provide equitable access to physical activity interventions?
Sowden SL; Breeze E; Barber J; Raine R
Br J Gen Pract; 2008 Oct; 58(555):e1-8. PubMed ID: 18826774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urgent suspected cancer referrals from general practice: audit of compliance with guidelines and referral outcomes.
Baughan P; Keatings J; O'Neill B
Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Nov; 61(592):e700-6. PubMed ID: 22054333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding variation in rates of referral among general practitioners: are inappropriate referrals important and would guidelines help to reduce rates?
Fertig A; Roland M; King H; Moore T
BMJ; 1993 Dec; 307(6917):1467-70. PubMed ID: 8281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urgent referrals for suspected cancer vary threefold among general practices.
Hawkes N
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e5195. PubMed ID: 22851593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Referral Decision Making of General Practitioners: A Signal Detection Study.
Kostopoulou O; Nurek M; Cantarella S; Okoli G; Fiorentino F; Delaney BC
Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 30799690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates: a cross sectional study of computerised data on new medical and surgical outpatient referrals in Nottinghamshire.
Hippisley-Cox J; Hardy C; Pringle M; Fielding K; Carlisle R; Chilvers C
BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7092):1458-61. PubMed ID: 9167564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. General practice performance in referral for suspected cancer: influence of number of cases and case-mix on publicly reported data.
Murchie P; Chowdhury A; Smith S; Campbell NC; Lee AJ; Linden D; Burton CD
Br J Cancer; 2015 May; 112(11):1791-8. PubMed ID: 25880009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study.
Møller H; Gildea C; Meechan D; Rubin G; Round T; Vedsted P
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5102. PubMed ID: 26462713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer detection via primary care urgent referral and association with practice characteristics: a retrospective cross-sectional study in England from 2009/2010 to 2018/2019.
Round T; Ashworth M; L'Esperance V; Møller H
Br J Gen Pract; 2021 Nov; 71(712):e826-e835. PubMed ID: 34544690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in general practice referral rate to acute medicine services and association with hospital admission. A retrospective observational study.
Lyall MJ; Beckett D; Price A; Strachan MWJ; Jamieson C; Morton C; Begg D; Simpson J; Lone N; Cameron A
Fam Pract; 2023 Mar; 40(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 36063441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary care referral practice, variability and socio-economic deprivation in colorectal cancer.
Borowski DW; Cawkwell S; Zaidi SM; Toward M; Maguire N; Gill TS
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 27110954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.
Guldbrandt LM
Dan Med J; 2015 Mar; 62(3):. PubMed ID: 25748876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of a continuing medical education meeting on the use and timing of urgent cancer referrals among general practitioners - a before-after study.
Toftegaard BS; Bro F; Falborg AZ; Vedsted P
BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28327100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
